南方医科大学学报, 2025, 45(4): 736-743 doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2025.04.08

老年患者胃肠道手术后综合并发症的危险因素——一项多中心观察性研究

吕雪彩,1,2,3, 刘艳红1,2,3, 韩诗怡1,2, 张浩赟1, 侯爱生1,2, 周志康1, 史立凯1, 高洁1, 曹江北1, 张宏1,2, 米卫东,1,2,3

1.解放军总医院,第一医学中心麻醉科,北京 100853

2.解放军总医院,解放军医学院,北京 100853

3.解放军总医院,老年病临床医学研究中心,北京 100853

Risk factors for overall postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries: a multicenter observational study

LÜ Xuecai,1,2,3, LIU Yanhong1,2,3, HAN Shiyi1,2, ZHANG Haoyun1, HOU Aisheng1,2, ZHOU Zhikang1, SHI Likai1, GAO Jie1, CAO Jiangbei1, ZHANG Hong1,2, MI Weidong,1,2,3

1.Department of Anesthesiology, First Medical Center, Beijing 100853, China

2.Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing 100853, China

3.Department of Anesthesiology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital Beijing 100853, China

通讯作者: 米卫东,博士,主任医师,博士生导师,E-mail:wwdd1962@163.com

编委: 吴锦雅

收稿日期: 2024-11-22  

基金资助: 国家重点研发计划.  2018YFC2001900

Received: 2024-11-22  

作者简介 About authors

吕雪彩,在读博士研究生,主治医师,E-mail:524339563@qq.com E-mail:524339563@qq.com

摘要

目的 探讨老年患者胃肠道手术后综合并发症的危险因素。 方法 纳入2020年4月~2022年4月全国17个中心1388例行择期胃肠道手术的老年患者。主要结局指标是术后30 d内综合并发症发生率,包括手术相关并发症、中枢神经精神系统、呼吸系统、心血管系统、消化系统并发症以及急性肾损伤。根据是否发生至少1种并发症将患者分为并发症组和无并发症组。比较两组患者基线资料,术前功能状态,术中麻醉和手术因素,用药情况、是否使用神经阻滞及术后镇痛等参数,采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析术后并发症的独立危险因素,并探讨术后急性疼痛与各系统并发症的相关性。 结果 老年患者胃肠手术后综合并发症发生率为50.8%(705/1388)。多因素分析显示,年龄[OR(95% CI):1.026(1.006~1.046)]、预后营养指数[OR(95% CI):0.998(0.997~1.000)]、术前生活质量评分[OR(95% CI): 0.094(0.018~0.500)]、失血量 [OR(95% CI):1.002(1.001~1.003)]以及术后急性疼痛[OR(95% CI): 1.308(1.033~1.657)]与术后并发症的发生率相关。术后重度疼痛患者神经精神系统并发症(27.2% vs 19.8%)、手术相关并发症(17.3% vs 10.2%)以及心血管系统并发症(3.6% vs 1.7%)的发生率显著升高。 结论 高龄、术前营养状态差、生活质量评分低、术中失血多以及术后急性疼痛控制不佳是老年患者胃肠道手术后并发症的独立危险因素。术后急性疼痛与多系统并发症存在显著相关性。

关键词: 胃肠道手术 ; 老年患者 ; 危险因素 ; 术后并发症 ; 疼痛

Abstract

Objective To investigate the risk factors of overall postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries. Methods This study was conducted among a total of 1388 elderly patients, who underwent elective gastrointestinal surgeries at 17 centers across China between April, 2020 and April, 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications within 30 days, including procedure-related, neuropsychiatric, respiratory, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal complications as well as acute kidney injury. Baseline characteristics, preoperative psychological and functional status, intraoperative anesthesia and surgical factors, intraoperative medication, use of nerve block, and postoperative analgesia methods were compared between the patients experiencing one or more postoperative complications and those without complications. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors for postoperative complications. The relationship between postoperative acute pain and each type of complication were explored. Results The incidence of overall postoperative complications was 50.8% (705/1388) in these patients. Multivariate analysis showed that age (OR: 1.026; 95% CI: 1.006-1.046), prognostic nutritional index (OR: 0.998; 95% CI: 0.997-1.000), preoperative EuroQol-5 dimensions score (OR: 0.094; 95% CI: 0.018-0.500), blood loss (OR: 1.002; 95% CI: 1.001-1.003), and acute postoperative pain (OR: 1.308; 95% CI: 1.033-1.657) were significantly associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications. Specifically, patients experiencing severe postoperative pain had a significantly higher incidence of neuropsychiatric (27.2% vs 19.8%), procedure-related (17.3% vs 10.2%), and cardiovascular complications (3.6% vs 1.7%). Conclusion An advanced age, a low preoperative nutritional index, a poor quality of life score, a greater volume of intraoperative blood loss, and acute postoperative pain are independent risk factors for postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries. There is a significant association between acute postoperative pain and multi-system complications.

Keywords: gastrointestinal surgery ; elderly patients ; risk factors ; postoperative complications ; pain

PDF (990KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

吕雪彩, 刘艳红, 韩诗怡, 张浩赟, 侯爱生, 周志康, 史立凯, 高洁, 曹江北, 张宏, 米卫东. 老年患者胃肠道手术后综合并发症的危险因素——一项多中心观察性研究. 南方医科大学学报[J], 2025, 45(4): 736-743 doi:10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2025.04.08

LÜ Xuecai, LIU Yanhong, HAN Shiyi, ZHANG Haoyun, HOU Aisheng, ZHOU Zhikang, SHI Likai, GAO Jie, CAO Jiangbei, ZHANG Hong, MI Weidong. Risk factors for overall postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries: a multicenter observational study. Journal of Southern Medical University[J], 2025, 45(4): 736-743 doi:10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2025.04.08

33.5%的胃肠道手术患者至少出现1种非致死性术后并发症,15%的患者发生2种或2种以上并发症1,老年患者胃肠道手术后并发症发病率和死亡率显著高于非老年人群。此类患者常合并多种疾病,如冠心病、高血压、糖尿病、脑血管病及肾功能不全等,其生理储备功能下降且组织修复能力减弱,可能进一步增加术后并发症风险2。因此,系统性分析老年患者胃肠道手术后综合并发症危险因素具有重要的临床意义。 既往研究表明,高龄、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级≥Ⅲ级、低血清白蛋白水平、术中低血压、围手术期输血和饮酒史与老年患者胃肠道手术后谵妄显著相关34。术前白细胞计数、出血量以及高血压病史是老年患者胃肠道手术后认知功能障碍的独立危险因素5。手术类型是术后胃肠道功能紊乱的主要预测因素6。吸烟、合并症、围手术期失血可增加术后切口感染的风险7。然而,目前研究多聚焦于胃肠道手术后某一特定类型或某个系统的并发症,针对老年患者胃肠道手术后综合并发症危险因素的分析仍较缺乏。此外,既往危险因素多集中于难以干预的因素(如年龄、肿瘤类型等),较少关注可干预的因素(如疼痛管理和用药)。值得注意的是,Yokozuka等8曾对189例行择期胃肠道手术的老年患者进行相关研究,但其单中心设计及小样本量限制了结论的普适性。曹庆等9评估了中性粒细胞计数与淋巴细胞计数的比值/血清白蛋白预测胃肠道手术后综合并发症的价值,其纳入的影响因素仅局限于人口学特征及肿瘤类型。基于此,本研究利用全国多中心前瞻性数据库,全面探索整个围手术期(包括术前、术中及术后)与术后综合并发症相关的危险因素,旨在识别高危患者,为临床针对性改善老年患者胃肠道手术后结局提供可能。

本研究对2020年4月~2022年4月在国内17家医院1388例接受择期胃肠道手术的老年患者资料进行回顾性分析,了解老年患者胃肠道手术后并发症的发生情况,识别术后综合并发症的独立危险因素,并探讨术后急性疼痛与术后各系统并发症的关系。

1 资料和方法

本研究数据来源于“中国老年患者围手术期数据库”,该数据库为一个来自多个地区和中心的围手术期老年患者的前瞻性队列。所有中心研究者均接受标准化操作流程培训,参与中心在线输入数据,并由数据核查人员进行审核和数据质量检查。原始数据库覆盖2020年4月~2022年4月期间接受非心脏手术的10 536例老年患者。本研究提取其中择期胃肠道手术患者数据进行分析,所有个人标识信息均已去标识化处理,以符合《赫尔辛基宣言》隐私保护原则。研究方案通过各参与中心伦理审查委员会批准(伦理批号:S2019-311-03),并在美国临床试验注册中心网站进行注册登记(网址为http://clinicaltrials.gov/,注册号为NCT04911530)。在原始前瞻性数据采集阶段,所有患者或受委托的近亲家属签署知情同意书。

1.1 研究对象

纳入标准:年龄≥65岁;接受全身麻醉下择期胃肠肿瘤切除术患者。排除标准:除胃/肠切除外,联合其他脏器的切除术;严重痴呆、语言障碍、听力或视觉严重受损、昏迷、终末期疾病等情况无法完成评估内容;患者或家属拒绝参与研究。剔除标准:术后30 d内并发症结局数据缺失的患者。

1.2 手术方式及围术期处理措施

所有患者均于入院后接受相应常规检查,术前给予预防性抗菌药物,行择期胃肠道手术治疗,术中常规监测心电图、无创血压、脉搏血氧饱和度、呼气末吸入麻醉药浓度、呼气末二氧化碳浓度、尿量等。所有患者均接受全身麻醉,必要时监测有创动脉压和中心静脉压。术中麻醉药物使用由麻醉医师酌情给予。术后实施补液、营养支持、镇痛等常规对症治疗。

1.3 信息收集和随访方法

住院期间收集患者基本信息(性别、年龄、合并症、体质量指数、ASA分级、吸烟饮酒史、术前营养支持、术前运动耐量分级、术前生活质量评价、术前衰弱状态),围手术期信息(手术方式、手术部位、手术时间、出血量、麻醉方式、术中镇痛药物使用情况、术后镇痛情况)和化验指标[血清白蛋白、血红蛋白、血糖、淋巴细胞计数,营养指数(PNI=血清白蛋白+淋巴细胞计数×5)]。麻醉方式分为单纯全身麻醉和全麻联合神经阻滞麻醉,术后是否镇痛分为无术后镇痛、术后采用静脉镇痛方式以及术后采用其他类型镇痛方式。分别在术后1~7 d由专门的访视团队在院内对患者进行随访,术后30 d通过电话随访。随访内容包括术后中枢神经精神系统并发症、心血管系统并发症、呼吸系统并发症、肾脏损伤和疼痛等。其中,谵妄在术后1~7 d采用意识错乱评估法(CAM)进行评估;抑郁在术后7 d和术后30 d采用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)进行评估;生活质量评价在术后7 d和术后30 d采用欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D及EQ-VAS)进行评估;术后急性疼痛评分在术后1~7 d和术后30 d采用数字评分法(NRS,0=无痛,10=最大疼痛)进行评估,≥7分,即存在重度疼痛。其他结局通过患者病例资料及化验检查获得。在患者签署知情同意书后,定期联系患者并及时解答患者相关疑问。研究中随访时间设置为访视窗口的±3 d。

1.4 量表评价标准

1.4.1 谵妄

采用CAM进行测量,其诊断需满足以下核心特征:患者存在急性起病且症状呈波动性变化,同时合并注意力不集中,并伴有思维紊乱或意识水平改变中的至少1项。

1.4.2 生活质量评价

采用EQ-5D及EQ-VAS进行评价。EQ-5D从行动能力、自我护理、日常活动、疼痛/不适、焦虑/抑郁5个维度生成健康效用值(范围为-0.391~1.000)。EQ-VAS则要求患者在0(最差健康状态)至100(最佳健康状态)的标尺上标记当前主观健康感受。

1.4.3 运动耐量评估

代谢当量(MET)是评估运动强度和能量代谢的重要指标,以静坐时的能量消耗为基准。根据心肺功能储备分为四级:>10 METs为优秀,7~10 METs为良好,4~7 METs为中等,<4 METs提示功能储备不足。

1.4.4 衰弱评估量表

FRAIL量表涵盖疲乏、阻力增加或耐力减退、自由活动下降、疾病情况、体质量下降5项指标。总分0~5分,0分为健壮,1~2分为衰弱前期,3~5分为衰弱。≥3分可诊断为衰弱。

1.4.5 抑郁评分

采用PHQ-9 评估抑郁症状。总分范围0~27分,0~4分为正常,5~9分提示轻度抑郁,10~14分为中度,≥15分属重度抑郁。将≥5分作为抑郁症状的识别阈值。

1.5 观察指标及评价方法

主要结局指标为术后30 d综合并发症发生率,定义为至少发生1种并发症,合并多系统并发症时仅计为1次事件。包括手术相关并发症:包括手术部位感染(术后30 d内伴脓性渗出或影像学感染证据)、吻合口瘘(影像学异常或二次手术证实)、乳糜瘘(乳糜性引流液)及肠梗阻(腹胀伴CT显示肠管扩张或粘连);神经精神系统并发症:谵妄、脑卒中(神经功能异常>24 h且影像学证实缺血灶)和抑郁;心血管系统并发症:非致命性心梗(肌钙蛋白异常合并缺血症状/心电图改变)、心衰(症状体征伴NT-proBNP>125 ng/L或超声心动图异常)、心律失常(包括非窦性心律失常和传导阻滞)及不稳定性心绞痛(典型症状伴ST-T改变);呼吸系统并发症:术后肺部感染(抗生素调整+发热/白细胞增多/影像学新发浸润影)、呼吸衰竭(PaO₂/FiO₂<300或SPO₂<90%)、胸腔积液/肺不张/气胸(影像学新发或进展性病变)及肺栓塞(肺动脉血栓证据);消化系统并发症:胃瘫(需干预的胃排空延迟)、消化道出血(呕血/黑便/血红蛋白下降)及腹泻(≥3次稀便/日需治疗);急性肾损伤:根据KDIGO标准,术后48 h内血清肌酐升高>26.5 μmol/L或术后7 d内升高至基线值1.5倍以上(基线值为术前30 d内最低值)。

1.6 统计学分析

样本量是基于“中国老年患者围手术期数据库”中所有符合条件的患者数量。采用SPSS 26.0 进行统计分析。通过直方图和Shapiro-Wilk检验评估数据分布的正态性,非正态分布的连续变量(年龄、身高、体质量、体质量指数、EQ-5D、EQ-VAS、PNI、血清白蛋白、血红蛋白、血糖、阿片类药物的消耗、出血量和手术时间)以中位数(四分位距,IQR)表示,组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验;分类变量以频率(百分比)表示,组间比较采用χ 2 检验。

采用Logistic回归进行单因素分析,并按照逐步进入法将变量纳入多因素Logistic回归模型,从而明确老年患者胃肠道手术后30 d综合并发症的独立危险因素。Logistic回归分析结果采用比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)报告。采用多因素Logistic回归分析探讨疼痛与术后各系统并发症的相关性,结果以森林图可视化。调整的协变量包括性别、年龄、体质量指数、吸烟、饮酒、术前慢性疼痛病史、术前营养支持、术前运动耐量分级、术前生活质量评价、术前衰弱、术中是否使用非甾体抗炎药物、术中是否使用右美托咪定、术中阿片类药物消耗、手术方式、手术部位、手术时间、出血量、麻醉方式以及术后镇痛情况。采用双侧检验,P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。缺失数据采用均值插补法进行插补。

2 结果

2.1 入组情况

共纳入1552例接受全身麻醉行择期胃肠道手术老年患者,其中164例因术后并发症结局数据缺失被排除,最终来自17个中心的1388例患者纳入分析(图1)。年龄中位数为71岁(IQR:68~76岁),男性占65.3%(906/1388),女性占34.7%(482/1388)。患者基线资料见表1

图1

图1   患者入组流程图

Fig.1   Flowchart of patient enrollment.


表1   患者的一般资料及单因素分析

Tab.1  Demographic characteristics and univariate analysis of the patients

ParameterTotal (n=1388)No postoperative complications (n=683)Have postoperative complications (n=705)OR (95% CI)P
Age (year)71.0 (68.0, 76.0)71.0 (68.0, 75.0)72.0 (68.0, 76.0)1.028 (1.008-1.048)0.005
Gender [n (%)]1.002 (0.804-1.250)0.984
Female906 (65.3%)446 (65.3%)460 (65.2%)
Male482 (34.7%)237 (34.7%)245 (34.8%)
Height (cm)164.6 (160.0, 170.0)165.0 (160.0, 170.0)164.6 (160.0, 170.0)1.001 (0.998-1.014)0.884
Weight (kg)63.7 (57.0, 70.0)63.7 (57.0, 70.0)63.7 (57.0, 70.0)0.997 (0.987-1.007)0.541
BMI (kg/m2)23.5 (21.3, 25.4)23.5 (21.3, 25.6)23.5 (21.4, 25.1)0.985 (0.953-1.018)0.374
ASA1.262 (1.001-1.590)0.049
Ⅰ-Ⅱ978 (70.5%)498 (72.9%)480 (68.1%)
Ⅲ-Ⅴ410 (29.5%)185 (27.1%)225 (31.9%)
Medical History [n (%)]
Hypertension605 (43.6%)289 (42.3%)316 (44.8%)1.107 (0.896-1.369)0.346
Diabetes290 (20.9%)131 (19.2%)159 (22.6%)1.227 (0.946-1.591)0.123
Coronary heart disease188 (13.5%)88 (12.9%)100 (14.2%)1.118 (0.821-1.521)0.479
Cerebrovascular disease79 (5.7%)31 (4.5%)48 (6.8%)1.537 (0.966-2.445)0.070
Respiratory disease55 (4.0%)21 (3.1%)34 (4.8%)1.597 (0.917-2.781)0.098
Kidney disease66 (4.8%)29 (4.2%)37 (5.2%)1.249 (0.759-2.055)0.381
Smoking432 (31.1%)218 (31.9%)214 (30.4%)0.930 (0.741-1.167)0.529
Alcohol consumption410 (29.5%)207 (30.3%)203 (28.8%)0.930 (0.738-1.171)0.537
Preoperative chronic pain255 (18.4%)106 (15.5%)149 (21.1%)1.459 (1.108-1.920)0.007
Preoperative nutritional support163 (11.7%)71 (10.4%)92 (13.0%)1.294 (0.931-1.798)0.125
Preoperative psychological and functional status
Frailty [n (%)]35 (2.5%)14 (2.0%)21 (3.0%)1.467 (0.740-2.909)0.272
EQ-5D1.0 (0.9, 1.0)1.0 (0.9, 1.0)0.9 (0.9, 1.0)0.073 (0.014-0.380)0.002
EQ-VAS76.0 (70.0, 80.0)76.0 (75.0, 80.0)76.0 (70.0, 80.0)0.992 (0.984-1.000)0.060
MET0.719 (0.483-1.070)0.104
<4108 (7.8%)45 (6.6%)63 (8.9%)
≥41280 (92.2%)638 (93.4%)642 (91.1%)
Preoperative laboratory test
PNI42.3 (37.4, 126.3)42.9 (38.1, 139.0)41.7 (36.8, 89.5)0.998 (0.997-1.000)0.043
Albumin (g/L)39.0 (36.2, 41.2)39.0 (36.5, 41.0)39.0 (36.0, 41.3)0.995 (0.984-1.006)0.401
Hemoglobin (g/L)120.6 (108.0, 134.0)122.0 (109.0, 135.0)120.3 (106.0, 134.0)0.996 (0.991-1.001)0.120
Glucose (µmol/L)5.5 (4.8, 5.8)5.5 (4.8, 5.8)5.5 (4.8, 5.8)1.021 (0.956-1.091)0.531
Intraoperative medication
Consumption of opioids (mg)143.5 (50.0, 232.9)140.0 (50.0, 230.0)148.0 (45.0, 240.0)1.000 (0.999-1.001)0.796
NSAIDs [n (%)]529 (38.1%)264 (38.7%)265 (37.6%)0.956 (0.770-1.187)0.683
Dexmedetomidine [n (%)]333 (24.0%)174 (25.5%)159 (22.6%)0.852 (0.666-1.090)0.203
Surgical/Anesthetic parameters
Blood loss (mL)100.0 (50.0, 128.7)60.0 (50.0, 128.7)100.0 (50.0, 128.7)1.002 (1.001-1.003)<0.001
Duration of surgery (min)191.5 (143.3, 240.0)185.0 (136.0, 230.0)198.4 (150.0, 250.0)1.002 (1.001-1.003)0.002
Location of surgery [n (%)]0.930 (0.746-1.160)0.521
Gastrectomy481 (34.7%)231 (33.8%)250 (35.5%)
Enterectomy907 (65.3%)452 (66.2%)455 (64.5%)
Type of surgery [n (%)]1.194 (0.934-1.527)0.157
Open1050 (75.6%)528 (77.3%)522 (74.0%)
Minimally invasive338 (24.4%)155 (22.7%)183 (26.0%)
Anesthesia methods [n (%)]0.843 (0.621-1.145)0.275
GA1197 (86.2%)582 (85.2%)615 (87.2%)
GA+RA191 (13.8%)101 (14.8%)90 (12.8%)
Postoperative analgesia methods [n (%)]0.191
No480 (34.6%)286 (36.5%)194 (34.6%)
Intravenous analgesia784 (56.5%)432 (55.2%)352 (56.5%)1.201 (0.954, 1.512)
Others124 (8.9%)65 (8.3%)59 (9.8%)1.338 (0.900, 1.990)
Postoperative acute pain1.359 (1.079-1.712)0.009
Mild to moderate pain973 (70.1%)501 (73.4%)472 (67.0%)
Severe pain415 (29.9%)182 (26.6%)233 (33.0%)

ASA: American standards association; BMI: Body mass index; CI: Confidence interval; EQ-5D: Euro quality of life-5 dimension; EQ-VAS: Euro quality of life-visual analogue scale; GA: General anesthesia; IQR: Interquartile range; MET: Metabolic equivalent of task; NSAIDs: Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs; RA: Regional anesthesia; OR: Odds ratio; PNI: Prognostic nutritional index. PNI=Albumin+Lymphocyte count ×5. Morphine equivalent doses were calculated to compare opioid consumption.

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


2.2 术后30 d综合并发症发生情况

1388例老年患者中,术后综合并发症705例(50.8%),其中呼吸系统并发症451例(32.5%),神经精神系统并发症306例(22.0%),手术相关并发症171例(12.3%),急性肾损伤53例(3.8%),需干预的消化系统并发症32例(2.3%),心血管系统并发症32例(2.3%)。发生率最高的并发症是肺部感染341例(24.6%),其次是谵妄231例(16.6%)和手术部位感染143例(10.3%)(表2)。

表2   术后并发症发生情况

Tab.2  Statistics of the occurrence of postoperative complications in these patients

Postoperative complicationsn (%)
Overall complications705 (50.8%)
Respiratory complications451 (32.5%)
Pulmonary infection341 (24.6%)
Respiratory failure7 (0.5%)
Pleural effusion60 (4.3%)
Atelectasis19 (1.4%)
Pneumothorax20 (1.4%)
Bronchiostenosis3 (0.2%)
Aspiration pneumonia2 (0.1%)
Pulmonary embolism3 (0.2%)
Pulmonary edema2 (0.1%)
Neuropsychiatric complications306 (22.0%)
Stroke12 (0.9%)
Delirium231 (16.6%)
Depression91 (6.6%)
Procedure-related complications171 (12.3%)
Surgical site infection143 (10.3%)
Anastomotic leakage47 (3.4%)
Ileus21 (1.5%)
Chylous fistula2 (0.1%)
Acute Kidney Injury53 (3.8%)
Gastrointestinal complications32 (2.3%)
Gastroparesis9 (0.6%)
Diarrhea16 (1.2%)
Gastrointestinal bleeding10 (0.7%)
Cardiovascular complications32 (2.3%)
Myocardial infarction4 (0.3%)
Heart failure3 (0.2%)
Angina1 (0.1%)
Arrhythmia25 (1.8%)
Cardiac arrest or death2 (0.1%)

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


2.3 胃肠道手术老年患者的一般资料及术后并发症的单因素分析

单因素分析显示,年龄、ASA分级、术前慢性疼痛史、术前EQ-5D评分、术前PNI、失血量、手术时间以及术后急性疼痛与术后综合并发症发生率显著相关,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05,表1)。

2.4 老年患者胃肠手术后综合并发症的多因素分析

多因素Logistic回归分析显示,高龄、较低的PNI、较低的EQ-5D评分、更多的失血量以及术后急性疼痛是术后综合并发症的独立危险因素(P<0.05,表3)。

表3   术后综合并发症的多因素分析

Tab.3  Multivariate analysis of postoperative complications in these patients

FactorbSEWaldOR (95% CI)P
Age (year)0.0260.0106.7101.026(1.006-1.046)0.010
Preoperative PNI-0.0020.0014.3520.998(0.997-1.000)0.037
Preoperative EQ-5D-2.3690.8557.6810.094(0.018-0.500)0.006
Blood loss (mL)0.0020.00021.0131.002(1.001-1.003)<0.001
Postoperative acute pain (Mild to moderate pain/severe pain)0.2690.1214.9591.308(1.033-1.657)0.026

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


2.5 急性疼痛与各系统并发症的多因素分析

重度疼痛患者术后30 d神经精神系统并发症(27.2% vs 19.8%)、手术相关并发症(17.3% vs 10.2%)以及心血管系统并发症(3.6% vs 1.7%)发生率高于轻中度疼痛患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,术后急性疼痛显著增加术后神经精神系统并发症 [OR(95% CI): 1.477(1.111~1.963)]、手术相关并发症[OR(95% CI):1.592,(1.125~2.252)]以及心血管系统并发症[OR(95% CI):2.380(1.116~5.073)]发生风险(图2)。

图2

图2   术后急性疼痛对各系统并发症影响的森林图

Fig.2   Forest plot of the effect of acute postoperative pain on postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries.


3 讨论

随着人口老龄化进程的加快,老年患者的围手术期管理和术前风险评估已成为临床实践的核心挑战。作为围手术期手术安全的重要参与者,麻醉医师通过识别高危患者,积极干预,有利于患者预后。本研究基于全国多中心前瞻性数据库,首次将麻醉可干预的围手术期指标(如术后急性疼痛)与传统风险因素(高龄、营养状态等)纳入同一分析框架。结果显示,高龄、预后营养指数、生活质量评分、失血量以及术后急性疼痛与术后30 d并发症存在显著相关性,这与既往文献一致10-12。此外,术后急性疼痛与多系统并发症的强关联性(OR=1.078~ 2.380),提示疼痛管理在老年患者围术期管理的重要地位。这一发现为麻醉医师主导的多学科干预提供了重要循证依据,也为个体化围手术期策略的制定指明了方向。

本研究中5个风险因素共同反映了老年患者“生理储备-应激反应”失衡的病理生理特征。高龄患者因线粒体功能衰退及端粒缩短13,导致氧化应激代偿能力显著下降,术中失血引发的缺血再灌注损伤可能进一步放大全身炎性反应。这一机制可部分解释本研究中高龄与并发症风险的显著相关性14。老年患者术后并发症发生率是非老年患者的2倍,死亡率是非老年患者的近5倍15。如何安全、稳定地保证老年手术患者度过围手术期是一项重大挑战。

预后营养指数作为营养状况的预测指标,通过血清白蛋白水平和淋巴细胞计数计算得来16。低PNI提示营养-免疫轴双重受损,血清白蛋白是反映营养状况的主要血浆蛋白,而淋巴细胞减少直接削弱病原体清除能力17。研究表明18,术前PNI高的胃癌患者即使发生术后并发症,预后也较好,提示术前营养支持对胃癌患者的重要性。在术前PNI评估的基础上实施围手术期免疫营养干预,可能会减少术后并发症的发生,进而改善治疗效果和远期结局。

EQ-5D是一种评估患者生活质量的量表,涵盖行动能力、疼痛感知及心理状态等多维度,是反映患者功能状态的综合指标。既往研究表明19,EQ-5D评分与衰弱呈负相关。患者行动能力减弱,消耗量降低,生活自理能力下降,而日常活动受影响则进一步导致耐力和行动力的减退,这可能是EQ-5D与衰弱密切相关的重要原因。本研究也评估了患者术前衰弱状态,多因素分析未观察到其与结局的相关性,这可能与患者的衰弱评估多为正常或仅为衰弱前期有关。此外,术前较低的EQ-5D评分不仅仅提示患者身体处于衰弱状态,可能还受情绪或疼痛的困扰,多系统储备能力减弱,极易受到应激源的影响,增加不良预后的风险。这也提示,传统以器官功能为核心的评估体系需向“躯体-心理-社会”多维模式转型。改善患者术前功能状态,提高患者生活质量评分对患者术后转归具有重要意义。

在胃肠道手术中,约30%的患者会经历严重的术后疼痛,约12%患者因疼痛相关症状就诊急诊20。术后疼痛控制不佳与术后并发症的增加相关,对生活质量和功能恢复产生负向影响21,是持续性疼痛和长期使用阿片类药物的危险因素22。本研究发现,术后重度疼痛患者神经精神并发症风险增加37.4%,手术相关并发症风险升高67.6%,这一结果提示在围手术期积极控制患者术后疼痛对患者预后至关重要。其机制可能是急性疼痛通过激活下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴,促进皮质醇及儿茶酚胺释放,抑制自然杀伤细胞活性,同时上调Toll样受体4信号通路,导致促炎因子(IL-6、TNF-α)过度表达23。动物实验表明,术后疼痛模型中小胶质细胞活化可诱发海马区神经元凋亡,这可能是谵妄高发的神经生物学基础24。本研究结果强调了在麻醉期间进行疼痛管理的重要性。这与近期其他几项研究结果一致,这些研究证实了急性疼痛与术后并发症,如谵妄、抑郁、心脏事件等之间存在关联25-27。基于加速康复外科的理念,单一的治疗模式无法充分管理疼痛和术后恢复情况。最近的研究表明,炎症-免疫反应不仅在术后疼痛恢复中发挥作用,而且在整个功能恢复中都发挥作用28。既往研究表明,微创手术可以减轻术后疼痛,还可减少炎症-免疫反应,从而改善患者预后29。此外,其他局部镇痛技术也被证明是有效的。在药物应用方面,术中使用大剂量糖皮质激素具有显著的镇痛作用,并可减轻术后疲劳和手术引起的其他不良病理生理反应30-34,从而促进患者康复。术中使用右美托咪定也可能改善患者术后疼痛,提高患者预后3536。因此,了解机体的哪些改变可以减轻患者术后疼痛,加速患者手术康复值得关注。

本研究结果显示,老年患者胃肠道手术后最常见的神经精神系统并发症是术后谵妄,发生率为16.6%,较既往文献报道略低3738。可能由于临床上更多的是识别出高活动型术后谵妄,而低活动型谵妄表现为嗜睡和注意力不集中等微妙症状,很难被诊断和识别。本研究中脑卒中发生率为0.9%,未包括隐匿性脑卒中。既往研究表明39,小而隐匿性脑血管损伤与抑郁的发生密切相关,神经疾病可能导致抑郁。此外,研究发现,卒中后抑郁的发生率更高,可能抑郁又会通过影响神经内分泌系统从而增加卒中等神经系统并发症的风险有关40。因此,本研究综合中枢神经系统和精神系统并发症的发生,更加全面的评估患者预后状况。

本研究存在一定的局限性。首先,本研究没有纳入肿瘤分期和新辅助放化疗情况,但纳入了与术后并发症可能相关的多种影响因素,包括营养、药物、功能状态、麻醉手术相关因素等;其次,本研究为观察性研究,虽然规定了严格的纳排标准并进行了多因素逻辑回归分析,但是仍然存在不可预知的混杂因素影响,未来有必要开展前瞻性大规模研究来提高结论的可靠性;第三,缺乏术后炎症标志物(如IL-6、C反应蛋白)的动态监测数据,限制了机制的深入探讨;最后,本研究发现术后急性疼痛与多系统并发症发生相关,但未对术后急性疼痛相关影响因素做进一步分析,未来有必要深入研究以通过控制术后急性疼痛来改善患者预后。

综上所述,老年患者胃肠道手术后并发症是多种风险因素交互作用的结果,其中术后急性疼痛作为麻醉可调控的关键节点,与多系统并发症存在强效关联。通过术前优化患者的营养状况、提高生理机能以及积极控制术后急性疼痛的整合策略,有望改善患者预后。未来研究需要进一步阐明疼痛免疫调控分子靶点,为临床制定针对性干预措施、减少并发症的发生提供新思路。

参考文献

Jakobson T, Karjagin J, Vipp L, et al.

Postoperative complications and mortality after major gastrointestinal surgery

[J]. Medicina, 2014, 50(2): 111-7.

[本文引用: 1]

Calderón-Larrañaga A, Vetrano DL, Ferrucci L, et al.

Multimorbidity and functional impairment-bidirectional interplay, synergistic effects and common pathways

[J]. J Intern Med, 2019, 285(3): 255-71.

[本文引用: 1]

Scholz AM, Oldroyd C, McCarthy K, et al.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for postoperative delirium among older patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery

[J]. Br J Surg, 2016, 103(2): e21-8.

[本文引用: 1]

Wang XY, Yu DD, Du YR, et al.

Risk factors of delirium after gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis

[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2023, 32(13/14): 3266-76.

[本文引用: 1]

Li YL, Huang HF, Le Y.

Risk factors and predictive value of perioperative neurocognitive disorders in elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumors

[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2021, 21(1): 193.

[本文引用: 1]

Zhong Y, Cao Z, Baumer D, et al.

Incidence and risk factors for postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction occurrence after gastrointestinal procedures in US patients

[J]. Am J Surg, 2023, 226(5): 675-81.

[本文引用: 1]

Kawashima J, Sahara K, Yamagishi S.

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy following colorectal perforation: defining the risk factors for delayed wound healing

[J]. Surg Today, 2023, 53(6): 728-35.

[本文引用: 1]

Yokozuka K, Tomita K, Nakagawa M, et al.

New risk factors of postoperative complications in elective gastrointestinal surgery of elderly patients: a prospective cohort study

[J]. BMC Surg, 2021, 21(1): 173.

[本文引用: 1]

曹 庆, 章文毅, 马 彭.

胃肠恶性肿瘤术后第2天NLR/ALB预测术后总并发症价值

[J]. 交通医学, 2022(5): 479-82.

[本文引用: 1]

Hirahara N, Tajima Y, Fujii Y, et al.

Prediction of postoperative complications and survival after laparoscopic gastrectomy using preoperative Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in elderly gastric cancer patients

[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(3): 1202-9.

[本文引用: 1]

Sasahara M, Kanda M, Ito S, et al.

The preoperative prognostic nutritional index predicts short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with stage II/III gastric cancer: analysis of a multi-institution dataset

[J]. Dig Surg, 2020, 37(2): 135-44.

Ripollés-Melchor J, Ramírez-Rodríguez JM, Casans-Francés R, et al.

Association between use of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and postoperative complications in colorectal surgery: the postoperative outcomes within enhanced recovery after surgery protocol (POWER) study

[J]. JAMA Surg, 2019, 154(8): 725-36.

[本文引用: 1]

López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, et al.

The hallmarks of aging

[J]. Cell, 2013, 153(6): 1194-217.

[本文引用: 1]

Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, et al.

Frailty in elderly people

[J]. Lancet, 2013, 381(9868): 752-62.

[本文引用: 1]

陆文良, DewanSheileshKumar, 郑松柏.

住院老年手术患者围术期并发症与死亡情况分析

[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2013, 32(12): 1319-21.

[本文引用: 1]

Sun Y, Ji Y, Wu K, et al.

Association of nutritional status with clinical outcomes of stroke patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion after emergency endovascular treatment

[J]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao, 2022, 42(9): 1397-402.

[本文引用: 1]

Yang Y, Gao P, Song Y, et al.

The prognostic nutritional index is a predictive indicator of prognosis and postoperative complications in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2016, 42(8): 1176-82.

[本文引用: 1]

Hirahara N, Tajima Y, Fujii Y, et al.

High preoperative prognostic nutritional index is associated with less postoperative complication-related impairment of long-term survival after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer

[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2020, 24(12): 2852-5.

[本文引用: 1]

Tanaka S, Ando K, Kobayashi K, et al.

The dual presence of frailty and locomotive syndrome is associated with a greater decrease in the EQ-5D-5L index

[J]. Nagoya J Med Sci, 2021, 83(1): 159-67.

[本文引用: 1]

VanDenKerkhof EG, Hopman WM, Reitsma ML, et al.

Chronic pain, healthcare utilization, and quality of life following gastrointestinal surgery

[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2012, 59(7): 670-80.

[本文引用: 1]

Strik C, van den Beukel B, van Rijckevorsel D, et al.

Risk of pain and gastrointestinal complaints at 6Months after elective abdominal surgery

[J]. J Pain, 2019, 20(1): 38-46.

[本文引用: 1]

de Boer HD, Detriche O, Forget P.

Opioid-related side effects: postoperative ileus, urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, and shivering. A review of the literature

[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2017, 31(4): 499-504.

[本文引用: 1]

Rodríguez-Palma EJ, Huerta de la Cruz S, Islas-Espinoza AM, et al.

Nociplastic pain mechanisms and toll-like receptors as promising targets for its management

[J]. Pain, 2024, 165(10): 2150-64.

[本文引用: 1]

Vergne-Salle P, Bertin P.

Chronic pain and neuroinflammation

[J]. Joint Bone Spine, 2021, 88(6): 105222.

[本文引用: 1]

Jin ZS, Hu J, Ma DQ.

Postoperative delirium: perioperative assessment, risk reduction, and management

[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2020, 125(4): 492-504.

[本文引用: 1]

Zywiel MG, Prabhu A, Perruccio AV, et al.

The influence of anesthesia and pain management on cognitive dysfunction after joint arthroplasty: a systematic review

[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(5): 1453-66.

Hung KC, Weng HL, Chen IW.

Association between pre-operative depression and postoperative pain outcomes

[J]. Anaesthesia, 2024, 79(6): 663-4.

[本文引用: 1]

Gaudillière B, Fragiadakis GK, Bruggner RV, et al.

Clinical recovery from surgery correlates with single-cell immune signatures

[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2014, 6(255): 255ra131.

[本文引用: 1]

Watt DG, McSorley ST, Horgan PG, et al.

Enhanced recovery after surgery: which components, if any, impact on the systemic inflammatory response following colorectal surgery? : a systematic review

[J]. Medicine, 2015, 94(36): e1286.

[本文引用: 1]

de la Motte L, Kehlet H, Vogt K, et al.

Preoperative methylprednisolone enhances recovery after endovascular aortic repair: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 260(3): 540-8;discussion548-9.

[本文引用: 1]

Lindberg-Larsen V, Ostrowski SR, Lindberg-Larsen M, et al.

The effect of pre-operative methylprednisolone on early endothelial damage after total knee arthroplasty: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

[J]. Anaesthesia, 2017, 72(10): 1217-24.

Lunn TH, Kristensen BB, et al.

Effect of high-dose preoperative methylprednisolone on pain and recovery after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2011, 106(2): 230-8.

Steinthorsdottir KJ, Kehlet H, Aasvang EK.

Surgical stress response and the potential role of preoperative glucocorticoids on post-anesthesia care unit recovery

[J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2017, 83(12): 1324-31.

Toner AJ, Ganeshanathan V, Chan MT, et al.

Safety of perioperative glucocorticoids in elective noncardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

[J]. Anesthesiology, 2017, 126(2): 234-48.

[本文引用: 1]

Lv XC, Zhang HY, Gao J, et al.

Intraoperative dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain in gastrointestinal surgery: an observational study

[J]. Int J Surg, 2023, 109(4): 887-95.

[本文引用: 1]

Lu Y, Fang PP, Yu YQ, et al.

Effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on recovery of gastrointestinal function after abdominal surgery in older adults: a randomized clinical trial

[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2021, 4(10): e2128886.

[本文引用: 1]

Liu J, Wang TT, Song J, et al.

Effect of esketamine on postoperative analgesia and postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery

[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2024, 24(1): 46.

[本文引用: 1]

Liu Q, Li LH, Wei JW, et al.

Correlation and influencing factors of preoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, and delirium in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery

[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2023, 23(1): 78.

[本文引用: 1]

Benedetti F, Bernasconi A, Pontiggia A.

Depression and neurological disorders

[J]. Curr Opin Psychiatry, 2006, 19(1): 14-8.

[本文引用: 1]

Levin OS, Vasenina EE.

Depression and cognitive decline in elderly: causes and consequences

[J]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova, 2019, 119(7): 87-94.

[本文引用: 1]

/