南方医科大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 761-769.doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2026.04.05

• • 上一篇    

老年患者全麻期间颈总动脉血流的动态变化及其生理调控机制:一项前瞻性研究

刘星扬1(), 吴静涵1, 叶春艳1, 王锷1,2(), 胡浩1()   

  1. 1.中南大学湘雅医院麻醉科,湖南 长沙 410008
    2.国家老年疾病临床研究中心(湘雅医院),湖南 长沙 410008
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-22 出版日期:2026-04-20 发布日期:2026-04-24
  • 通讯作者: 王锷,胡浩 E-mail:198112348@csu.edu.cn;ewang324@csu.edu.cn;mzwsq7413@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘星扬,博士,E-mail: 198112348@csu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金联合基金项目(U24A20230);湖南省自然科学基金重点项目(2024JJ3051)

Dynamic changes and physiological regulation of common carotid artery blood flow during general anesthesia in elderly patients: a prospective study

Xingyang LIU1(), Jinghan WU1, Chunyan YE1, E WANG1,2(), Hao HU1()   

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
    2.National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders (Xiangya Hospital), Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
  • Received:2025-11-22 Online:2026-04-20 Published:2026-04-24
  • Contact: E WANG, Hao HU E-mail:198112348@csu.edu.cn;ewang324@csu.edu.cn;mzwsq7413@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Joint Fund Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U24A20230)

摘要:

目的 颈动脉血流减少与围术期脑血管及神经系统并发症密切相关,但其在全身麻醉期间的变化规律及生理调控因素仍缺乏系统认识。 方法 前瞻性纳入193例接受腹部手术的老年患者,连续记录围术期呼吸、循环参数及麻醉深度指标。采用矢量血流成像技术在多个关键时间点测量颈总动脉(CCA)血流量。将心率、平均动脉压、呼气末二氧化碳及双频指数纳入线性混合效应模型,并以患者作为随机效应,分析并解释术中CCA血流变化的生理决定因素。 结果 老年患者在全身麻醉期间CCA血流呈现明显的阶段性波动。线性混合效应模型可解释术中CCA血流变异的52.0%(调整后R²=0.520,P<0.001)。心率、平均动脉压、呼气末二氧化碳及双频指数均与颈动脉血流变化显著相关(P<0.001)。标准化模型进一步显示,不同生理指标对CCA血流的调节强度存在明显差异,其中血流动力学相关指标的影响高于血压或心率变化。手术方式及手术体位对颈动脉血流无显著影响。 结论 本研究从整体生理调控角度表明,术中脑灌注并非单纯依赖血压维持,而是受到通气水平、循环状态及麻醉深度的协同调控。有效识别和管理相关影响因素有助于优化术中脑灌注。

关键词: 颈总动脉血流量, 脑灌注, 矢量血流成像, 老年患者, 全身麻醉

Abstract:

Objective To explore the dynamic pattern and physiological regulation of common carotid artery (CCA) blood flow during general anesthesia in elderly patients. Methods A total of 193 elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery were prospectively enrolled. Respiratory and hemodynamic variables and anesthetic depth of the patients were recorded throughout the perioperative period. CCA blood flow was measured at predefined time points using vector flow imaging. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, end-tidal carbon dioxide, and bispectral index were included in a linear mixed-effects model, with patient ID as a random effect, to explore the physiological determinants of intraoperative CCA blood flow. Results CCA blood flow showed clear stage-related changes during general anesthesia. The mixed-effects model explained 52.0% of the variation in CCA blood flow (adjusted R²=0.520, P<0.001). Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, end-tidal carbon dioxide, and bispectral index were all significantly associated with CCA blood flow (all P<0.001). The standardized model further showed that the strength of these associations differed, with flow-related factors showing a stronger effect than blood pressure or heart rate alone. Surgical approach and patient position had no significant effect on CCA blood flow. Conclusion Intraoperative cerebral perfusion is not maintained by blood pressure alone but influenced jointly by ventilation, hemodynamic status, and anesthetic depth. Recognizing and managing these factors may help optimize cerebral perfusion during surgery.

Key words: common carotid artery blood flow, cerebral perfusion, vector flow imaging, elderly patients, general anesthesia