Journal of Southern Medical University ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 686-692.doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2026.03.22

Previous Articles    

Revision and validation of Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for Children and Adolescents

Zhijing SUN1,2(), Wei LI3, Xinfeng TANG4(), Meng YU1,2()   

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
    2.Department of Psychiatry, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China
    3.College of Educational Science and Technology, Northwest University for Nationalities, Lanzhou 730030, China
    4.Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
  • Received:2025-08-16 Online:2026-03-20 Published:2026-03-26
  • Contact: Xinfeng TANG, Meng YU E-mail:sunzhijing2023@126.com;tangxinfeng36@gmail.com;yumengbnu@163.com

Abstract:

Objective To adapt the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for Children and Adolescents (LSAS-CA) to Chinese cultural contexts and assess its reliability and validity among Chinese adolescents. Methods A total of 2103 vocational high school students (917 males and 1186 females; mean age 16.73±1.24 years) in Guangdong Province completed an online survey using the LSAS-CA. Item analysis and psychometric evaluations were conducted. The concurrent validity of the scale was assessed using the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents (SAS-A), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Post-Event Processing Inventory-Trait (PEPI-T), and its discriminant validity was examined using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). Three months later, 210 of the students were retested to examine the test-retest reliability of LSAS-CA. Results The Chinese LSAS-CA retained 24 items (12 social interaction and 12 performance situations) for assessing anxiety and avoidance with a total of 48 scored responses. Confirmatory factor analysis was used for comparing fitting of 4 competing models (unidimensional, two-factor, bifactor, and higher-order models), and the bifactor model showed the best fit: anxiety bifactor model (χ²=3168.263, df=224, χ²/df=14.144, RMR=0.022, GFI=0.875, AGFI=0.832, PGFI=0.653, NFI=0.931, TLI=0.921, CFI=0.936, and RMSEA=0.079); avoidance bifactor model (χ²=3144.601, df=216, χ²/df=14.558, RMR=0.019, GFI=0.875, AGFI=0.826, PGFI=0.630, NFI=0.944, TLI=0.933, CFI=0.948, and RMSEA=0.080). Conclusion The revised Chinese version of LSAS-CA has acceptable reliability and validity in the context of Chinese culture and provides a more convenient measurement tool for Chinese researchers to study adolescent social anxiety.

Key words: social anxiety, adolescents, reliability and validity, model comparison, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for Children and Adolescents