Journal of Southern Medical University ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1003-1012.doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2025.05.13
Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhuolin GUO(), Zhiheng ZHANG, Xindeng GUO, Weiwei YANG, Zhiqing LIANG, Jinying OU, Huihui CAO, Zibin LU, Linzhong YU, Junshan LIU(
)
Received:
2024-12-25
Online:
2025-05-20
Published:
2025-05-23
Contact:
Junshan LIU
E-mail:1145536587@qq.com;liujunshanty@163.com
Zhuolin GUO, Zhiheng ZHANG, Xindeng GUO, Weiwei YANG, Zhiqing LIANG, Jinying OU, Huihui CAO, Zibin LU, Linzhong YU, Junshan LIU. Comparison of anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and analgesic activities of formulated granules versus traditional decoction of Yinqiao Powder[J]. Journal of Southern Medical University, 2025, 45(5): 1003-1012.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.j-smu.com/EN/10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2025.05.13
Primer | Primer sequence (5'-3') | Primer length (nt) |
---|---|---|
Mouse-β-actin F | ATGGATGAGGAAATCGCTG | 19 |
Mouse-β-actin R | ATGCCAACCATCACTCCCTG | 20 |
Mouse-IL-6 F | ATGCCAACCATCACTCCCTG | 20 |
Mouse-IL-6 R | TTTGATGTCGTTCACCAGGA | 20 |
Mouse-TNF-α F | GCTGGATCTTCAAAGTCGGGTGTA | 24 |
Mouse-TNF-α R | TGTGAGTCTCAGCACACTTCCATC | 24 |
Mouse-IL-1β-F | TCGCAGCAGCACATCAACAAGAG | 23 |
Mouse-IL-1β-R | TGCTCATGTCCTCATCCTGGAAGG | 24 |
Tab.1 Primer sequences for RT-qPCR
Primer | Primer sequence (5'-3') | Primer length (nt) |
---|---|---|
Mouse-β-actin F | ATGGATGAGGAAATCGCTG | 19 |
Mouse-β-actin R | ATGCCAACCATCACTCCCTG | 20 |
Mouse-IL-6 F | ATGCCAACCATCACTCCCTG | 20 |
Mouse-IL-6 R | TTTGATGTCGTTCACCAGGA | 20 |
Mouse-TNF-α F | GCTGGATCTTCAAAGTCGGGTGTA | 24 |
Mouse-TNF-α R | TGTGAGTCTCAGCACACTTCCATC | 24 |
Mouse-IL-1β-F | TCGCAGCAGCACATCAACAAGAG | 23 |
Mouse-IL-1β-R | TGCTCATGTCCTCATCCTGGAAGG | 24 |
Fig.1 Effect of Yinqiao Powder granules (YQS KL) and decoction (YQS YP) on RAW 264.7 cells with LPS-induced inflammation. A, B: Cytotoxicity of YQS YP and KL in RAW 264.7 cells. C: Inhibitory effects of YQS YP and KL on expression of phosphorylated STAT3 in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells. D-F: Inhibitory effects of YQS YP and KL on mRNA expressions of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells (Mean±SD, n=3). ##P<0.01, ###P<0.001 vs control (C); **P<0.01,***P<0.001 vs Model (M) group.
Group | Concentration (μg/mL) | Number of deaths | Mortality rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|
CON | - | 0 | 0 |
YQS YP | 100 | 0 | 0 |
200 | 0 | 0 | |
400 | 0 | 0 | |
800 | 0 | 0 | |
1000 | 2 | 10 | |
YQS KL | 100 | 0 | 0 |
200 | 0 | 0 | |
400 | 0 | 0 | |
800 | 0 | 0 | |
1000 | 1 | 5 |
Tab.2 Acute toxicity of Yinqiao Powder granules (YQS KL) and decoction (YQS YP) in zebrafish for 72 h
Group | Concentration (μg/mL) | Number of deaths | Mortality rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|
CON | - | 0 | 0 |
YQS YP | 100 | 0 | 0 |
200 | 0 | 0 | |
400 | 0 | 0 | |
800 | 0 | 0 | |
1000 | 2 | 10 | |
YQS KL | 100 | 0 | 0 |
200 | 0 | 0 | |
400 | 0 | 0 | |
800 | 0 | 0 | |
1000 | 1 | 5 |
Fig.2 Effects of YQS YP and KL on neutrophil aggregation in the yolk sac of a zebrafish model with LPS microinjection (Black arrow: Neutrophil) (HE staining, original magnification: ×200).
Fig.3 Effects of YQS YP and YQS KL on neutrophil aggregation in 4 zebrafish inflammation models. A, B: Zebrafish model of CuSO4-induced inflammation. C, D: Zebrafish model of inflammation with tail transection. E, F: Zebrafish model of inflammation induced by LPS microinjection. G, H: Zebrafish model of inflammation induced by poly (I: C) microinjection. ##P<0.01, ###P<0.001 vs control (C) group; *P<0.05,**P<0.01, ***P<0.001 vs Model (M) group.
Fig.5 Anti-inflammatory effects of YQS YP and YQS KL on acute lung injury mice. A: YQS YP and KL reduce wet-dry lung weight ratio of the mice. B-E: YQS YP and KL reduce TNF-α and IL-6 levels in mouse BALF and lung tissue. F: YQS YP and KL inhibit protein expression of p-STAT3 (Tyr 705) in mouse lung tissue. *P<0.05, **P<0.01,***P<0.001 vs LPS group; ###P<0.001 vs CON group.
Group | Dose (g/kg) | Pain threshold improvement rate(%) | Number of twists |
---|---|---|---|
CON | - | 2.63±8.94 | 34.79±6.20 |
SLFSN | 0.05 | 48.68±11.21*** | 16.15±3.71*** |
YQS YP | 20 | 38.79±8.94*** | 17.67±6.44*** |
15 | 21.75±8.24*** | 18.25±5.06*** | |
10 | 12.79±7.27 | 21.89±3.98*** | |
YQS KL | 20 | 45.53±10.71*** | 16.43±3.73*** |
15 | 33.67±11.32*** | 18.80±4.31*** | |
10 | 8.90±9.34 | 23.50±2.61*** |
Tab.3 Effects of YQS YP and YQS KL on pain threshold and number of twisted lifts in mice
Group | Dose (g/kg) | Pain threshold improvement rate(%) | Number of twists |
---|---|---|---|
CON | - | 2.63±8.94 | 34.79±6.20 |
SLFSN | 0.05 | 48.68±11.21*** | 16.15±3.71*** |
YQS YP | 20 | 38.79±8.94*** | 17.67±6.44*** |
15 | 21.75±8.24*** | 18.25±5.06*** | |
10 | 12.79±7.27 | 21.89±3.98*** | |
YQS KL | 20 | 45.53±10.71*** | 16.43±3.73*** |
15 | 33.67±11.32*** | 18.80±4.31*** | |
10 | 8.90±9.34 | 23.50±2.61*** |
Bacterial species | YQS YP (MIC) | YQS KL (MIC) |
---|---|---|
Escherichia coli | 31.25 | 31.25 |
Staphylococcus aureus | 15.63 | 15.63 |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | 31.25 | 31.25 |
Tab.4 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of YQS YP and YQS KL against 3 bacteria (mg/mL)
Bacterial species | YQS YP (MIC) | YQS KL (MIC) |
---|---|---|
Escherichia coli | 31.25 | 31.25 |
Staphylococcus aureus | 15.63 | 15.63 |
Streptococcus pneumoniae | 31.25 | 31.25 |
1 | 张 伟, 孙叶芬, 金传山, 等. 中药配方颗粒研究现状与展望[J]. 中草药, 2022, 53(22): 7221-33. |
2 | 朱佳军. 中药配方颗粒的应用现状调查与对策分析[J]. 中医药管理杂志, 2024, 32(14): 59-61. |
3 | 叶娇燕. 免煎中药配方颗粒在临床应用中的优势与问题[J]. 中医药管理杂志, 2023, 31(12): 88-90. |
4 | 黄 荣. 中药配方颗粒发展与研究现状[J]. 中医药管理杂志, 2024, 32(5): 82-4. |
5 | 麻利杰, 姚 静, 路 露, 等. 中药配方颗粒汤剂与传统汤剂一致性评价存在的问题及建议[J]. 医药导报, 2023, 42(7): 1039-48. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2023.07.016 |
6 | 胡 佳, 张 营, 成焕波, 等. 中药配方颗粒与饮片(汤剂)等效性研究综述[J]. 亚太传统医药: 1-5. |
7 | 陈毅恒, 许二平, 谢忠礼, 等. 银翘散方源考证及制方理论分析[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志, 2022, 28(9): 1488-91. |
8 | Fu YJ, Yan YQ, Qin HQ, et al. Effects of different principles of Traditional Chinese Medicine treatment on TLR7/NF‑κB signaling pathway in influenza virus infected mice[J]. Chin Med, 2018, 13: 42. |
9 | 金永鹞, 李泽世, 辛相如, 等. 银翘散临床应用进展[J]. 中国民间疗法, 2022, 30(23): 116-21. DOI: 10.19621/j.cnki.11-3555/r.2022.2336 |
10 | 郑志慧. 复方银花解毒汤抗流感病毒药效作用及机制研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2023. |
11 | 原 静, 冯晓涛, 邓绍勇, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情对中药材价格的影响研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2022(12): 82-5, 201. |
12 | 霍炳杰, 常 靓. 不同煎煮方式对银翘散汤剂抗炎解热作用的影响[J]. 辽宁中医杂志, 2016, 43(5): 1031-3. |
13 | Zhang HM, Xu L, Song J, et al. Establishment of quality evaluation method for Yinqiao Powder: a herbal formula against COVID-19 in China[J]. J Anal Methods Chem, 2022, 2022: 1748324. |
14 | 潘竞锵, 刘惠纯, 韩 超, 等. 银翘散浓缩袋泡剂抗炎 解热 镇痛 抗菌和抗病毒作用[J]. 广东药学, 2003, 13(1): 43-7. |
15 | 林 渊, 林露璐. 银翘散固体汤剂与煮散剂的抗炎作用比较研究[J]. 光明中医, 2018, 33(21): 3147-50. |
16 | 肖锦仁, 吴红娟, 郭 昱, 等. 不同剂型银翘散抗菌、抗病毒作用的研究[J]. 湖南中医学院学报, 2003, 23(1): 15-8. |
17 | Deng D, Zhao MF, Liu HW, et al. Xijiao Dihuang decoction combined with Yinqiao powder promotes autophagy-dependent ROS decrease to inhibit ROS/NLRP3/pyroptosis regulation axis in influenza virus infection[J]. Phytomedicine, 2024, 128: 155446. |
18 | Li K, Chen XM, Zhong J, et al. The effects of the Xijiao Dihuang decoction combined with Yinqiao powder on miRNA-mRNA profiles in mice infected with influenza a virus[J]. BMC Complement Med Ther, 2020, 20(1): 286. |
19 | 刘月圆. 黄连解毒汤传统饮片汤剂与配方颗粒汤剂药效学对比研究[J]. 中外医学研究, 2016, 14(22): 135-6. |
20 | 全智慧, 赵自明, 黄雪君, 等. 制川乌配方颗粒与标准煎剂对二甲苯致小鼠耳肿胀抑制作用的比较研究[J]. 药物评价研究, 2014, 37(4): 309-16. DOI: 10.7501/j.issn.1674-6376.2014.04.005 |
21 | 谭婉清, 王术玲, 刘潇潇, 等. 化橘红配方颗粒与饮片汤剂的化学等量性和药效等效性研究[J]. 中药新药与临床药理, 2023, 34(4): 541-9. DOI: 10.19378/j.issn.1003-9783.2023.04.015 |
22 | 余景滔, 周红玲, 刘俊珊, 等. 基于斑马鱼炎症模型的凉膈散及其组分甘草不同极性部位的抗炎活性评价及作用机制[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2022, 28(20): 17-26. |
23 | 郭新邓, 郭卓琳, 孙冬梅, 等. 连翘配方颗粒与饮片的抗炎、抗肿瘤和抑菌效果的比较研究[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2024, 44(3): 594-604. DOI: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.03.22 |
24 | Hillmer EJ, Zhang HY, Li HS, et al. STAT3 signaling in immunity[J]. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, 2016, 31: 1-15. |
25 | Kiszałkiewicz JM, Majewski S, Piotrowski WJ, et al. Evaluation of selected IL6/STAT3 pathway molecules and miRNA expression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 22756. |
26 | Robinson P, Magness E, Montoya K, et al. Genetic and small-molecule modulation of Stat3 in a mouse model of Crohn's disease[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(23): 7020. |
27 | Zou SL, Tong QY, Liu BW, et al. Targeting STAT3 in cancer immunotherapy[J]. Mol Cancer, 2020, 19(1): 145. |
28 | 何再安, 方 颖, 刘焱文, 等. 银翘散传统饮片与配方颗粒的化学成分比较[J]. 中国中医药信息杂志, 2003, 10(3): 42-3. |
29 | 束雅春, 秦昆明, 殷放宙, 等. 银翘散传统饮片汤剂与配方颗粒汤剂的比较研究[J]. 中国民族民间医药, 2011, 20(23): 78-9. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8517.2011.23.043 |
30 | 李 磊, 花 丽, 王文龙. 当归川芎药对配方颗粒挥发性成分工艺过程转移率分析[J]. 化工与医药工程, 2019, 40(5): 21-4. |
31 | 杨晓东, 何广铭, 彭 娇, 等. 肉豆蔻饮片及其标准汤剂中挥发性成分差异分析[J]. 江西中医药, 2021, 52(7): 65-8. |
[1] | GUO Xindeng, GUO Zhuolin, SUN Dongmei, ZOU Lifang, OU Jinying, YU Linzhong, LU Zibin, CAO Huihui, LIU Junshan. Single extract of Forsythia Suspense versus the prepared drug in pieces: comparison of their anti-inflammatory, antitumor and antibacterial effects in zebrafish [J]. Journal of Southern Medical University, 2024, 44(3): 594-604. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||