Journal of Southern Medical University ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (06): 918-.
Previous Articles Next Articles
Online:
Published:
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the application value of three risk-stratification criteria in domestic GIST risk assessment.Methods The clinical data of 144 patients with GIST who were admitted to our hospital from January 2008 to December 2010were analyzed retrospectively. 144 cases of GISTs were evaluated for their biologic potential by the risk-stratification criteria ofFletcher, NIH2008, and among those, 119 cases of GISTs were evaluated by the risk-stratification criteria of Miettinen. Fletcherand Miettinen criteria were compared by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The Logistic regression model was established toanalyze the comparison of Miettinen and NIH2008 criteria. Results (1) According to Fletcher criteria in the intermediate riskGISTs, the recurrence-free survival (RFS) of non gastric(small intestinal, rectal and so on) GISTs and gastric GISTs werestatistically different (P=0.001). According to Miettinen criteria, in the risk subgroup of GISTs,the recurrence-free survival ofdifferent location of GISTs had no statistical difference(P>0.05); (2)Logistic regression model judgment rate: Miettinen criteria(89.4)>NIH2008 criteria (85.2). Conclusion Fletcher criteria is simple and easy to use, but may misjudge the prognosis of theGIST in different part; Miettinen criteria may be a potential supplementary way of NIH2008 criteria in domestic GIST riskassessment.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.j-smu.com/EN/
https://www.j-smu.com/EN/Y2013/V33/I06/918