南方医科大学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (03): 283-.

• •    下一篇

薄层CT与18F-FDG PET/CT 联合运用可提高肺孤立性结节定性诊断的准确性

任云燕,李友财,吴湖炳,王全师,韩彦江,周文兰,李洪生,王珍,MOHAMMED Shah Alam   

  • 出版日期:2017-03-20 发布日期:2017-03-20

Combined use of thin-section CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT for characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules

  • Online:2017-03-20 Published:2017-03-20

摘要: 目的探索如何将病灶SUVmax与薄层CT相结合,提高18F-FDG PET/CT对肺孤立性结节的定性诊断准确性。方法回顾 性分析267例经手术病理检查或临床随访证实的SPN患者的18F-FDG PET/CT及薄层CT显像结果,依据薄层CT将SPN分为实 性结节与非实性结节。分别采用标准1(SUVmax≥2.5)和标准2(SUVmax结合薄层CT综合分析)诊断肺癌,以病理和临床随访为金 标准,分析两种标准对肺孤立性结节的诊断效能。结果采用两种标准诊断肺癌的灵敏度和准确性分别为80.4%、76.4%(标准 1)和91.0% 、87.2%(标准2)(均P<0.05)。在非实性结节中,良、恶性病灶的SUVmax无明显显著性差异(P>0.05),而病灶大小和 分叶征、含气支气管征或空泡征以及病灶内有无粗大血管等CT征象对鉴别诊断有意义(均P<0.05)。40例PET表现为低代谢 的肺癌患者,均被误诊为良性病变,结合薄层CT图像,纠正了其中50%(20/40)的诊断。采用标准1诊断肺癌,灵敏度为40.0%, 而采用标准2诊断肺癌,灵敏度为90%,标准2对非实性结节诊断的灵敏度明显高于标准1(P=0.000),但特异性无显著性差异 (75.2% vs 58.3%,P=0.667)。然而,对实性结节,薄层CT对于诊断结果无明显影响(均P>0.05)。结论对于肺孤立性结节,仅依 据SUVmax≥2.5诊断肺癌,诊断效能并不理想。对非实性结节,须依据SUVmax和薄层CT所见进行综合分析。

Abstract: Objective To investigate whether fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) combined with thin-section CT improves the diagnostic performance for solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). Methods A total of 267 patients underwent examinations with 18F-FDG PET/CT and thin-section CT for evaluating the SPNs with undetermined nature, which was further confirmed by pathological examination or clinical follow-up. The performance of two diagnostic criteria based on findings in PET/CT alone (Criterion 1) and in PET/CT combined with thin-section CT (Criterion 2) were compared. Results Thin-section CT provided greater diagnostic information for SPNs in 84.2% of the patients. Compared with Criterion 1, the diagnosis based on Criterion 2 significantly increased the diagnostic sensitivity (80.4% vs 91%, P<0.01) and accuracy (76.4% vs 87.2%, P<0.01) for lung cancer. The lesion size and the CT features including lobulation, air bronchogram, and feeding vessel, but not SUVmax, were all helpful for characterizing non-solid SPNs. Thin-section CT rectified diagnostic errors in 50% (20/40) of the cancerous lesions, which had been diagnosed as benign by PET due to their low metabolism. For non-solid SPNs, Criterion 2 showed a significantly higher diagnostic sensitivity than Criterion 1 (90.0% vs 40.0%, P=0.000) but their diagnostic specificity were comparable (75.2% vs 58.3%, P=0.667). For solid nodules, the use of thin-section CT resulted in no significant improvement in the diagnostic performance (P>0.05). Conclusion The combination of PET/CT and thin-section CT creates a synergistic effect for the characterization of SPNs, especially non-solid nodules.