南方医科大学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (04): 538-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

广东人群亚健康状态与健康促进生活方式的相关性

陈洁瑜,杨乐斌,蒋平平,孙晓敏,余克强,李斐,吴升伟,姬彦兆,赵晓山,罗仁   

  • 出版日期:2016-04-20 发布日期:2016-04-20

Associations between health-promoting lifestyle and suboptimal health status in Guangdong: a cross sectional study

  • Online:2016-04-20 Published:2016-04-20

摘要: 目的探讨广东人群亚健康状态与健康促进生活方式的相关性。方法对2012~2013年进行了24 159人(12~80岁)的大 样本、多中心的横断面调查;生活方式的评估使用《健康促进生活方式量表》,健康状况的判定主要结合被调查者的体检报告及 《亚健康评定量表》。结果在24 159名调查对象中,亚健康(46.0%)及疾病(35.2%)人群所占的比例远高于健康者(18.8%);回 归分析发现健康促进生活方式对健康状态有显著影响(P<0.001),不良的生活方式是亚健康和疾病的危险因素,且其对亚健康 状态的影响比对疾病的影响更大;在校正一般人口学资料的模型中,相对于优秀的促进健康生活方式(最小暴露者),差的生活 方式(最高暴露者)发生亚健康的危险性高达43倍(OR:42.825,95% CI:30.567~59.997),一般的生活方式(较高暴露者)发生亚 健康的危险性高达21 倍(OR:21.072,95% CI:17.258~25.729),次优的生活方式发生亚健康的危险性为4 倍(OR:4.085,95% CI:3.352~4.979)。且在一般人群中,压力管理差、自我实现差、运动锻炼少、人际关系差是亚健康状态的最主要危险因素。结 论亚健康状态与不良生活方式密切相关;对可改变的生活方式危险因素的组合进行干预,是健康促进的有效方法;将慢性管理 的窗口前移,加强对亚健康状态“窗口”的健康管理至关重要。

Abstract: Objective To investigate associations between health-promoting lifestyle and suboptimal health status (SHS) in the population of Guangdong province. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in a clustered sample of 24 159 individuals aged 12-80 years from 2012 to 2013. Health-promoting lifestyle was assessed via the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP-II), and SHS was evaluated using the medical examination report and Sub-health Measurement Scale V1.0 (SHMS V1.0). Results Of the 24159 participants, subjects with SHS (46.0%) and disease status (35.2%) accounted for a much higher percentage than healthy subjects (18.8%). Regression analyses revealed a significant association between health status and healthy lifestyle (P<0.001). Unhealthy lifestyle was an important risk factor for SHS and disease, especially the former. Compared with the participants with a healthy lifestyle (minimal exposure), after demographic adjustment, subjects with a ’poor’ lifestyle (maximal exposure) were at a 43 times higher risk of developing SHS (OR: 42.825, 95% CI: 30.567-59.997), those with a general lifestyle were at a 21 times higher risk of SHS (OR: 21.072, 95%CI: 17.258-25.729), and those with a suboptimal lifestyle had a 4 times higher risk (OR: 4.085, 95% CI: 3.352-4.979). In the general population, the major risk factors for SHS included poor stress management, poor self-actualization, inactive exercise and poor interpersonal relationship. Conclusions Unhealthy lifestyles are significantly related to an increased risk of SHS. Intervention of unhealthy lifestyles, controlling the risk factors of SHS, and rigorous management of the time window of SHS are necessary to promote the heath status.