南方医科大学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (03): 401-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

Tp-e间期Tp-e/QT与ICD一级预防患者发生恶性室性心律失常的关系

朱庭延,滕树恩,陈燕玉,刘深荣,孟素荣,彭健   

  • 出版日期:2016-03-20 发布日期:2016-03-20

Correlation of Tp-e interval and Tp-e/Q-T ratio with malignant ventricular arrhythmia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention

  • Online:2016-03-20 Published:2016-03-20

摘要: 目的探讨心电图T波峰末间期(Tp-e)及T波峰末间期与QT间期的比值(Tp-e/QT)与ICD一级预防患者发生恶性室性心 律失常的关系。方法分析我院2011年3月~2014年2月因严重慢性心功能不全(左室射血分数≤35%,纽约心功能分级为Ⅱ/Ⅲ 级,且既往从未发生过室速或室颤等恶性心律失常)接受ICD(植入式心脏复律除颤器)一级预防的患者68例,对所有的患者随 访18~38个月(平均26个月)。在随访过程中,患者根据是否发生终点事件分为高危组及低危组;本研究以SCD或室颤、室速作 为终点事件。术前对所有的患者进行12 导联心电图、心脏彩超、24 h 动态心电图等检查,并分析Tpeak-Tend 间期及 (Tpeak-Tend)/QT。结果随访过程中,因ICD识别持续性室速或室颤而引发恰当放电的患者共11例,由ICD发现非持续性室速 而不需治疗的患者共7例,故高危组患者共18例。从未发生室速或室颤者共50例为低危组。高危组患者的(Tp-e)105±15 ms 明显高于低危组90±17 ms(P=0.003);(Tpeak-Tend)/QT比值在高危组与低危早组相比有明显的统计学差异(0.27±0.04 vs 0.22± 0.05,P=0. 002). TpTe/QT≥0.255预测ICD一级预防患者发生恶性室性心律失常风险的敏感性和特异性分别为72.2%和65.9%; TpTe≥103 ms预测ICD一级预防患者发生恶性室性心律失常风险的敏感性和特异性分别为66.7%和67.9%。结论Tp-e间期、 Tp-e/QT比值与ICD一级预防患者发生恶性室性心律失常的关系密切,Tpeak-Tend间期及Tp-e/QT比值越大,ICD一级预防患 者发生恶性室性心律失常如室速、室颤的可能性越大。

Abstract: Objective To investigate whether Tpeak-Tend interval (Tp-e) and Tp-e/QT ratio are associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention. Methods A cohort of 68 consecutive patients with chronic heart failure undergoing standard ICD for primary prevention indications (NYHA function class II-III, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% , systolic cardiomyopathy without prior malignant ventricular arrhythmia) were enrolled in this study. The patients were followed up for 18-48 months and were divided into high-risk group and low-risk group according to the occurrence of the endpoint events of sudden cardiac death (SCD), ventricular tachycardia (VT), or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic characteristics, Tp-e, and Tp-e/ QT ratio were analyzed in all cases before ICD implantation. Results During the follow-up, ICD shock for sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation occurred in 11 patients; nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) that did not require therapy was detected by ICD in 7 patients (high-risk group, 18 cases). ICD did not detect ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in 50 patients (low-rsk group). Compared with the low-rsik group, the high-risk group had an increased Tp-e /QT ratio (0.27±0.04 vs 0.22±0.05 P<0.01) and an increased Tp-e (105±15 vs 90±17 ms P<0.01). ROC analysis revealed that a Tp-e/QT ratio ≥0.255 had a sensitivity of 72.2% and a specificity of 65.9%, and a Tp-e ≥103 ms had a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 67.9% for predicting VT and VF in these patients. Conclusion Increased Tp-e and Tp-e/QT ratio are associated with increased risks of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ICD for primary prevention.