Journal of Southern Medical University ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (08): 1199-.
Previous Articles Next Articles
Online:
Published:
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transumbilical single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy(TSPLC). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted for the 141 patients, who received TSPLC by DR. Jian in ourhospital since April 2011 to October 2012, and the operative and postoperative effects of these patients were evaluated bycomparing with that of the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Results In the total of 141 TSPLC cases thatincluded in the study, 3 cases converted to CLC. 2 cases converted to open cholecystectomy. Additionally, 1 case was diagnosedas an unexplained bowel perforation after operation, fat liquefaction occurred in 2 patients. When comparing with these casesto 306 CLC patients, there was no obvious statistical difference in the terms of patients’ age, gender, BMI and abdominalsurgery history (P>0.05). Meanwhile, There were similar effects of the two groups of patients on the operation time (28.5±19.3min vs 33.4±14.2 min,P=0.001), estimate blood loss (6.4±18.9 ml vs 9.8±20.6 ml,P=0.06), the time needed for closing abdomen(5.1±3.8 min vs 5.8±4.3 min,P=0.06) and postoperative complications (3/141 vs 5/306,P=1.00). However, the TSPLC group wassuperior to CLC group in the terms of the conversion rate (2/141 vs 25/306,P=0.001), and postoperative hospitalization (1.2±1.4d vs 2.6±1.7 d,P<0.01), meanwhile, TSPLC was also superior to LC on the satisfactory degree of operative effect through theone week‘s follow-up (8.5±1.1 vs 7.9±0.7,P<0.01). Conclusion TSPLC is both safer and more effective than that of CLC, andthus it is worth adopting in selected hospitals.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.j-smu.com/EN/
https://www.j-smu.com/EN/Y2013/V33/I08/1199