Journal of Southern Medical University ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 553-562.doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2024.03.17

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Predictive value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for adverse left ventricular remodeling after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

CUI Jianing, LIU Wenjia, YAN Fei, ZHAO Yanan, CHEN Weijie, LUO Chuncai, ZHANG Xinghua, LI Tao   

  1. Department of Radiology, First Medical Center, PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China; Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China; Department of Radiology, 985th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-04-03

Abstract: Objective To assess the value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for predicting adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and serial CMR (cine and LGE sequences) images of 86 STEMI patients within 1 week and 5 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), including 25 patients with adverse LV remodeling and 61 without adverse LV remodeling, defined as an increase of left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) over 15% at the second CMR compared to the initial CMR. The CMR images were analyzed for LV volume, infarct characteristics, and global and infarct zone myocardial function. The independent predictors of adverse LV remodeling following STEMI were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Logistic regression methods. Results The initial CMR showed no significant differences in LV volume or LV ejection fraction (LVEF) between the two groups, but the infarct mass and microvascular obstructive (MVO) mass were significantly greater in adverse LV remodeling group (P<0.05). Myocardial injury and cardiac function of the patients recovered over time in both groups. At the second CMR, the patients with adverse LV remodeling showed a significantly lower LVEF, a larger left ventricular end- systolic volume index (LVESVI) and a greater extent of infarct mass (P<0.001) with lower global peak strains and strain rates in the radial, circumferential, and longitudinal directions (P<0.05), infarct zone peak strains in the 3 directions, and infarct zone peak radial and circumferential strain rates (P<0.05). The independent predictors for adverse LV remodeling following STEMI included the extent of infarct mass (AUC=0.793, 95% CI: 0.693-0.873; cut- off value: 30.67% ), radial diastolic peak strain rate (AUC=0.645, 95% CI: 0.534-0.745; cut-off value: 0.58% ), and RAAS inhibitor (AUC=0.699, 95% CI: 0.590- 0.793). Conclusion The extent of infarct mass, peak radial diastolic strain rate, and RAAS inhibitor are independent predictors of adverse LV remodeling following STEMI.

Key words: adverse left ventricular remodeling; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; cardiac magnetic resonance; cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking; myocardium strain