南方医科大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 686-692.doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2026.03.22

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    

Liebowitz儿童和青少年社交焦虑量表的修订与信效度检验

孙芷菁1,2(), 李伟3, 唐信峰4(), 余萌1,2()   

  1. 1.南方医科大学公共卫生学院心理学系,广东 广州 510515
    2.南方医科大学珠江医院精神心理科,广东 广州 510282
    3.西北民族大学教育科学与技术学院,甘肃 兰州 730030
    4.中国人民大学心理学系,北京 100872
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-16 出版日期:2026-03-20 发布日期:2026-03-26
  • 通讯作者: 唐信峰,余萌 E-mail:sunzhijing2023@126.com;tangxinfeng36@gmail.com;yumengbnu@163.com
  • 作者简介:孙芷菁,在读本科生,E-mail: sunzhijing2023@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(21YJC190020)

Revision and validation of Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for Children and Adolescents

Zhijing SUN1,2(), Wei LI3, Xinfeng TANG4(), Meng YU1,2()   

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
    2.Department of Psychiatry, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China
    3.College of Educational Science and Technology, Northwest University for Nationalities, Lanzhou 730030, China
    4.Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
  • Received:2025-08-16 Online:2026-03-20 Published:2026-03-26
  • Contact: Xinfeng TANG, Meng YU E-mail:sunzhijing2023@126.com;tangxinfeng36@gmail.com;yumengbnu@163.com

摘要:

目的 修订适合中国文化背景下使用的Liebowitz儿童和青少年社交焦虑量表(LSAS-CA),检验其在中国青少年中的信效度。 方法 使用LSAS-CA对广东省某职业高中的2103名学生(男生917人,女生1186人,平均年龄16.73±1.24岁)进行线上问卷调查,并进行项目分析和信效度检验;同时采用青少年社交焦虑量表(SAS-A)、病人健康问卷(PHQ-9)和特质性事后加工过程量表(PEPI-T)作为效标效度;采用自尊量表(RSES)进行区分效度检验。3个月后对其中210名学生重测,检验LSAS-CA的重测信度。 结果 中文版LSAS-CA共24个条目,包括12个社交互动情景和12个表现情景,分别评定焦虑和回避程度,共48个评分项。通过验证性因子分析,比较4个竞争模型(单维、双维、双因子模型以及高阶因子模型)的拟合情况。双因子模型更能解释量表结构:焦虑因子(χ²=3168.263,DF=224,χ²/DF=14.144,RMR=0.022,GFI=0.875,AGFI=0.832,PGFI=0.653,NFI=0.931,TLI=0.921,CFI=0.936,RMSEA=0.079)和回避因子(χ²=3144.601,DF=216,χ²/DF=14.558,RMR=0.019,GFI=0.875,AGFI=0.826,PGFI=0.630,NFI=0.944,TLI=0.933,CFI=0.948,RMSEA=0.080)模型拟合指数均尚可接受。 结论 本研究修订的中文版LSAS-CA在中国文化背景下表现出可接受的信效度,为国内学者研究青少年社交焦虑提供了更加便捷的测量工具,以促进研究进展与干预实践。

关键词: 社交焦虑, 青少年, 信效度, 模型比较, LSAS-CA

Abstract:

Objective To adapt the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for Children and Adolescents (LSAS-CA) to Chinese cultural contexts and assess its reliability and validity among Chinese adolescents. Methods A total of 2103 vocational high school students (917 males and 1186 females; mean age 16.73±1.24 years) in Guangdong Province completed an online survey using the LSAS-CA. Item analysis and psychometric evaluations were conducted. The concurrent validity of the scale was assessed using the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents (SAS-A), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Post-Event Processing Inventory-Trait (PEPI-T), and its discriminant validity was examined using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). Three months later, 210 of the students were retested to examine the test-retest reliability of LSAS-CA. Results The Chinese LSAS-CA retained 24 items (12 social interaction and 12 performance situations) for assessing anxiety and avoidance with a total of 48 scored responses. Confirmatory factor analysis was used for comparing fitting of 4 competing models (unidimensional, two-factor, bifactor, and higher-order models), and the bifactor model showed the best fit: anxiety bifactor model (χ²=3168.263, df=224, χ²/df=14.144, RMR=0.022, GFI=0.875, AGFI=0.832, PGFI=0.653, NFI=0.931, TLI=0.921, CFI=0.936, and RMSEA=0.079); avoidance bifactor model (χ²=3144.601, df=216, χ²/df=14.558, RMR=0.019, GFI=0.875, AGFI=0.826, PGFI=0.630, NFI=0.944, TLI=0.933, CFI=0.948, and RMSEA=0.080). Conclusion The revised Chinese version of LSAS-CA has acceptable reliability and validity in the context of Chinese culture and provides a more convenient measurement tool for Chinese researchers to study adolescent social anxiety.

Key words: social anxiety, adolescents, reliability and validity, model comparison, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for Children and Adolescents