南方医科大学学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (08): 1069-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

呼吸肌肉锻炼加序贯无创正压通气在稳定期重度慢阻肺患者中的应用:临床随机对照试验

周露茜,黎晓莹,李允,郭炳鹏,关力理,陈新,罗裕文,罗鹏,陈荣昌   

  • 出版日期:2016-08-20 发布日期:2016-08-20

Inspiratory muscle training followed by non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial

  • Online:2016-08-20 Published:2016-08-20

摘要: 目的探讨呼吸肌肉锻练序贯无创通气的肺康复策略的临床应用价值。方法88例患者随机分为序贯组、呼吸肌肉锻炼 组、无创组及对照组并干预8周。评价生活质量(SRI)、呼吸肌力(MIP、MEP)、呼吸困难(MRC)、运动耐量(6MWD)及肺功能。 结果序贯组、锻炼组及无创组SRI总分、6MWD、MRC均显著改变(P均<0.05),且序贯组△SRI、△6MWD、△MRC和锻炼组、 无创组间有显著性差异(P均<0.05)。序贯组、锻炼组MIP、MEP显著性提高(P均<0.05),且序贯组△MIP、△MEP与锻炼组间 有统计学差异(P<0.05)。肺功能无统计学差异(P均>0.05)。结论呼吸肌肉锻练序贯无创通气康复策略对于稳定期重度慢阻 肺患者而言临床效果最优,与单用呼吸肌肉锻炼、单用无创正压通气或长期氧疗相比更能改善生活质量、呼吸肌力、缓解呼吸困 难及提高运动耐量。

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of inspiratory muscle training followed by non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods This investigator-initiated randomized, controlled trial recruited 88 patients with stable GOLD stage IV COPD, who were randomized into 4 equal groups to continue oxygen therapy (control group) or to receive inspiratory muscle training followed by non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (IMT-NPPV group), inspiratory muscle training only (IMT group), or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation only (NPPV group) for at least 8 weeks. The outcomes of the patients were assessed including the quality of life (SRI scores), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), dyspnea (MRC scores), 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and lung function. Results Compared to baseline values, SRI scores, 6MWT and MRC scores increased significantly after 8 weeks in IMT-NPPV, IMT and NPPV groups, and the improvements were significantly greater in IMT-NPPV group than in IMT and NPPV groups (P<0.05 for all). In IMT-NPPV and IMT groups, MIP and MEP increased significantly after the training (P<0.05), and the improvement was more prominent in IMT-NPPV group (P<0.05). No significant changes were found in pulmonary functions in the groups after 8 weeks of treatment (P>0.05). Conclusion Inspiratory muscle training followed by non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, compared with inspiratory muscle training or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation alone, can better enhance the quality of life, strengthen the respiratory muscles, improve exercise tolerance and relieve the dyspnea in patients with COPD.