南方医科大学学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (05): 674-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

DC-CIK细胞免疫治疗联合TACE术治疗原发性肝癌

郭伟伟,刘莉,吴德华   

  • 出版日期:2014-05-20 发布日期:2014-05-20

Dendritic cell-cytokine induced killer cell immunotherapy combined with transcatheter
arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: safety and efficacy

  • Online:2014-05-20 Published:2014-05-20

摘要: 目的探讨树突状细胞-细胞因子诱导的杀伤细胞(DC-CIK)免疫治疗联合TACE术在原发性肝癌中的临床疗效。方法回
顾性分析从2010年4月~2013年4月间在本院确诊并行TACE术的68例原发性肝癌患者,按是否联合DC-CIK治疗分为联合治
疗组(30例)和对照组(38例),对比分析治疗后两组患者无进展生存期、总生存期、生活质量改善、DC-CIK细胞治疗安全性等指
标。结果治疗组的中位无进展生存期为16个月,而对照组则为7个月,对比有统计学意义(P=0.033);治疗组的中位总生存期
为24个月,对照组为13个月,治疗组的1年生存率为80%,对照组则为75.2%,但两组对比无统计学意义(P=0.089);多因素分析
提示BCLC分期、治疗前AFP水平是影响无进展生存期的独立预后因素;而BCLC分期是影响总生存期的独立预后因素。治疗
组患者生活质量改善10例(33.3%)对比对照组4例(10.5%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.034);CIK治疗组治疗后仅有3例患者出
现发烧、1例出现过敏反应,对症处理后均恢复正常。结论DC-CIK细胞免疫治疗联合TACE术相比单纯TACE术,有助于延长
患者的无进展生存期,但在总生存期方面两组无统计学差异。此外,联合治疗能改善中晚期肝癌患者的生存质量,且治疗安全
可靠。

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of dendritic cell-cytokine induced killer cell (DC-CIK) immunotherapy
combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods Thirty
patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TACE combined with DC-CIK cell therapy and 38 patients treated with
TACE alone (control group) were compared for progression-free survival time, overall survival time, quality of life, and
treatment-related adverse events. Results The median progression-free survival was 16 months in the combined treatment
group as compared with 7 months in the control group (P=0.033). The median overall survival time was 24 months in the
combined treatment group and 13 months in the control group, with 1-year overall survival rates of 80% and 75.2% ,
respectively, showing no significant differences between the two groups (P=0.089). Multivariate analysis indicated that
Barcelona-Clinic-Liver-Cancer (BCLC) staging and AFP level before treatment were two independent risk factors of
progression-free survival time, and BCLC stage served also as an independent risk factor of the overall survival time. Ten
patients in the combined treatment group (33.3%) showed improved quality of life, as compared with 4 patients (10.5%) in the
control group (P=0.034). Three patients receiving DC-CIK treatment experienced fever and 1 had allergic reaction, and the
symptoms remitted after expectant treatment. Conclusion Compared with TACE alone, DC-CIK immunotherapy combined
with TACE can improve the patients’ progression-free survival time but not the overall survival time. The combined therapy
also improves the quality of life of the patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and shows good treatment safety.