南方医科大学学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (03): 454-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

超声弹性成像应变率中的ROI A值与弹性评分诊断甲状腺结节的价值比较

安秀艳,丛淑珍,钱隽,郭玉萍,周立峰,梁婷   

  • 出版日期:2013-03-20 发布日期:2013-03-20

Value of ROI A value in strain ratio and elasticity scores in differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules using ultrasonic elastography

  • Online:2013-03-20 Published:2013-03-20

摘要: 目的探讨弹性应变率中的ROI A值在鉴别诊断甲状腺良恶性结节的价值,并与弹性评分作对比。方法对124例患者共
166 个甲状腺结节术前均行弹性成像检查,获得弹性评分与弹性应变率中的ROI A值,采用ROC曲线评价ROI A值对甲状腺结
节的诊断价值并寻找其最佳诊断界点,将ROI A值、弹性评分及两者联合诊断结果分别与病理结果对照。结果ROI A值在鉴
别甲状腺良恶性结节的ROC曲线下面积(Az)为0.825,ROI A值最佳诊断界点为0.00165,ROI A值、弹性评分、两者联合诊断甲
状腺结节的敏感性、特异性、准确性、比数比分别为82.93%、72.80%、75.30%、13.0;87.80%、80.00%、81.93%、28.8;73.17%、
91.20%、86.75%、32.1。联合诊断的比数比最高,联合诊断准确性显著高于ROI A值(χ2=19.31,P<0.05)及弹性评分(χ2=12.03,
P<0.05)。结论ROI A值在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节上有中等诊断价值,有一定临床实用性,与弹性评分联合诊断有助于提高诊
断准确性。

Abstract: Objective To study the value of ROI A value in the strain ratio and the elasticity scores by the 4-score system in
ultrasonic elastography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Methods A total of 124 patients
with 166 thyroid nodules underwent examinations with real-time ultrasonic elastography to obtain the elasticity score and the
ROI A value in strain ratio. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic value of ROI A
value, and the best cutoff point was determined. The results of diagnosis based on ROI A value, elasticity scores, and their
combination were compared with the results of pathological diagnosis. Results The area under the ROC curve (Az) of ROI A
value for differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules was 0.825. The best diagnostic cut-off point of ROI A value was
0.00165. In differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and odds ratio were
82.93%, 72.80%, 75.30%, and 13.0 for ROI A value, 87.80%, 80.00%, 81.93%, and 28.8 for the elasticity scores, and 73.17%,
91.20%, 86.75%, and 32.1 for their combination, respectively. The odds ratio of the combined diagnosis was the highest, and the
accuracy of the combined diagnosis was significantly higher than that of ROI A value (χ2=19.31, P<0.05) and the elasticity
scores (χ2=12.03, P<0.05). Conclusion ROI A value has moderate diagnostic value and clinical practicability in differentiating
thyroid nodules. The diagnostic accuracy of ROI Avalue can be improved by combining with the elasticity scores.