南方医科大学学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 1418-1421.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

棘突截骨椎管成形内固定术治疗退行性脊柱侧弯的临床研究

曾明, 赵新建, 张毅, 黄星球, 蔡春水   

  1. 广东省佛山市第一人民医院骨科, 广东, 佛山, 528000
  • 出版日期:2005-11-20 发布日期:2005-11-20
  • 基金资助:
    收稿日期:2005-5-16。
    作者简介:曾明(1965-),1989年毕业于广州中山医科大学,医学学士,副主任医师,E-mail:zengming@fsyyy.com

Application of restorative laminoplasty combined with spinous process osteotomy and internal fixation for treatment of degenerative scoliosis

ZENG Ming, ZHAO Xin-jian, ZHANG Yi, HUANG Xing-qiu, CAI Chun-shui   

  1. 广东省佛山市第一人民医院骨科, 广东, 佛山, 528000
  • Online:2005-11-20 Published:2005-11-20

摘要: 目的 探讨棘突截骨椎管成形椎弓根钉内固定术在治疗矢状位脊柱畸形较轻型退行性脊柱侧弯并腰椎管狭窄的临床效果。方法 我院1999~2003年经手术治疗合并腰椎管狭窄的中老年退行性脊柱侧弯44例,其中单节段狭窄25例、双节段19例。男18例,女26例,年龄47~72岁,平均63岁。采用后正中纵切口,包含融合节段上下各一椎体,行单侧椎板开窗减压7例、单节段全椎板切除18例、双节段全椎板切除19例,将减压节段的棘突从基底截取,去除一面皮质行单面皮质保留横行覆盖骨窗,如骨窗较大可取相邻节段的棘突,再行椎板Moe融合矫形内固定(Isola17例、Diapa-son27例)。术后进行Oswestry疗效评分与影像学观察。结果 随访1~4年,平均3年,术后1年随访33例,优良率93.9%;术后2年随访27例,优良率为88.9%。术后2年CT扫描未见椎管内疤痕形成,椎管直径明显增加;覆盖的棘突融合时间3~6个月,平均4个月,融合率为92.6%。2例固定节段上一椎体压缩性骨折,其中1例椎弓根钉松动;1例椎弓根钉断裂无症状,骨窗已融合;1例伤口延迟愈合。无复发性椎管狭窄、腰椎滑脱及脊柱失代偿、假关节等并发症。结论 棘突截骨椎管成形内固定术,能在减压固定的基础上减少椎管内疤痕形成,防止腰椎管狭窄复发;提高覆盖骨融合率并缩短融合时间,近中期效果好。是矢状位脊柱畸形较轻型退行性脊柱侧弯并腰椎管狭窄症满意的治疗方法。

Abstract: Objective For treatment of mild degenerative scoliosis (DS) complicated with lumbar canal stenosis (LCS), posterior decompression and the spinal canal enlargement with spinous process osteotomy was performed in combination with fusion and pedicle screw instrument fixation. Methods Between 1999 and 2003, 18 male and 26 female elderly patients (with mean age of 63 years, ranging from 47 to 72 years) with DS complicated with LCS were treated with the described surgical procedures, including 25 with single segment lesion and 19 with involvement of 2 segments. A posterior medical incision from one vertebra superior to the target fusion area till the vertebral segment below it was made for spinal exposure. Undermining enlargement of the spinal canal was carried out according to the segments of the stenosis; in some cases the intervertebral disc was resected. Osteotomy was subsequently performed at the base of the spinous process, and the bony defect was covered with the spinous processes. Finally Moe fusion and Isola (17 cases) or Diapason (27 cases) instrument fixation were performed. The therapeutic effects were evaluated according to Oswestry scores and postoperative imaging examinations. Results The average follow-up period was 3 years, ranging from 1 to 4 years. Thirty-three patients were followed up for one year and 93.9% of them had excellent or good outcome; 27 patients were followed up of 2 years and showed a rate for excellent or good results of 88.9%. Both sagittal and transverse diameters of the lumbar spinal canal were increased obviously as found by CT scanning without spinal canal scar. A rate of 92.6% of the ostetomized spinous processes had bony fusions. Successful covering bone healing was achieved in a mean of 4 months after surgery. Compressive vertebral fractures superior to the fixed segments occurred in 2 cases, including 1 with pedicle screw loosening and the other with pedicle screw breakage. Another patient had delayed wound healing. No recurrence of LCS, spondylolisthesis and decompensation, or pseudarthrosis of the spine was observed in these cases. Conclusion The described surgical procedures for DS can decrease the occurrence of spinal canal scar and promote the healing of the covering bone, and can be a satisfactory treatment for mild DS complicated with LCS in the lumbar sagittal curve.

中图分类号: