南方医科大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 621-627.doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.04.21

• • 上一篇    下一篇

晚期胃癌生存预后因素及列线图预测模型的建立与验证

张力苹,刘喜娟,林 卉,王嘉丽,张启周   

  • 出版日期:2021-04-20 发布日期:2021-04-30

Factors affecting survival prognosis of advanced gastric cancer and establishment of a nomogram predictive model

  • Online:2021-04-20 Published:2021-04-30

摘要: 目的 探讨新药治疗下晚期胃癌患者生存预后因素,并建立可靠的预测模型。方法 收集我院肿瘤内科2015年1月~2019年12月收治的晚期胃癌(AGC)患者的的临床特征、辅助检查资料、治疗相关资料、疗效评估、疾病转归等相关临床资料,建立数据库,采用Kaplan-Meier法进行单因素生存分析,并根据单因素分析结果、将部分因素纳入多因素Cox回归模型进行分析,筛选出影响AGC患者生存的影响因素。R软件用于分析生存率及通过多因素分析结果建立生存列线图。编制校准曲线和一致性指数(C-index)以确定预测能力和判别能力。通过时间相关的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)、临床决策曲线分析(DCA)以证实列线图模型的预测能力。结果 单因素分析显示,转移部位数目、接受治疗线数、一线治疗疗效是否达到疾病控制率(DCR)、一线治疗中位无进展生存(PFS)时间,以及一线是否接受手术治疗与AGC患者总生存(OS)显著相关(P<0.05)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,一线是否接受手术治疗、接受治疗线数、一线治疗PFS时间、腹膜转移与晚期胃癌患者OS显著相关,是影响AGC患者OS的独立预后因素(P<0.05)。列线图的C-index为0.785(95%CI,0.744~0.826)。校准曲线也证实了模型与实际生存的一致性。此外,ROC曲线和DCA结果表明该模型对AGC患者OS有较好的预测能力。结论 AGC伴腹膜转移患者生存期较短,而一线治疗PFS时间>7.0月、接受三线及后线治疗与较长的生存期相关;选择性对部分晚期胃癌患者进行含手术的系统治疗方案可改善其生存期。本研究构建的列线图是一个可靠的AGC预后预测模型。

关键词: 晚期胃癌;总生存;预后因素;列线图

Abstract: Objective To explore the factors affecting the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer and establish a reliable predictive model of the patients' survival outcomes. Methods We retrospectively collected the clinical data from patients with advanced gastric cancer treated in our department between January, 2015 and December, 2019. Univariate survival analysis was carried out using Kaplan-Meier method followed by multivariate Cox regression analysis to identify the factors associated with the survival outcomes of the patients. The R package was used to generate the survival rates, and a nomogram was established based on the results of multivariate analysis. The calibration curves and C-index were calculated to determine the predictive and discriminatory power of the model. The performance of the nomogram model for predicting the survival outcomes of the patients was evaluated using receiver- operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results Univariate analysis showed that the number of metastatic sites, the number of treatment lines received, disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) time following first-line treatment, and surgical treatment in first-line treatment were significantly correlated with the survival time of the patients (P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that surgical treatment, number of treatment lines, PFS time following first-line treatment and peritoneal metastasis, as independent prognostic factors, were significantly correlated with the patients' survival (P<0.05). The C-index of the nomogram was 0.785 (95%CI: 0.744-0.826) for overall survival of the patients. The calibration curves showed that the actual survival rate of the patients was consistent with the predicted survival rate. The time-dependent AUC and DCA demonstrated that the nomogram had a good performance for predicting the survival outcomes of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Conclusion Peritoneal metastasis is associated with s shorter overall survival time of patients with advanced gastric cancer, while a PFS time following first-line treatment of more than 7.0 months and third-line and posterior-line treatments are related with a longer survival time. Systematic treatment including elective surgery can improve the survival outcomes of the patients. The nomogram we established provides a reliable prognostic model for evaluating the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Key words: advanced gastric cancer; over survival; prognostic factor; nomogram