南方医科大学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 1530-1538.doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2020.10.22

• • 上一篇    

COVID-19流行期间广东省普通群众及医务人员心理状况对比及影响因素调查

刘峥嵘,张旭东,吕芷菡,梁 洁,邓玉娣,冯麟斐   

  • 出版日期:2020-10-20 发布日期:2020-10-20

Mental health status and its influencing factors among general population and medical personnel in Guangdong Province during COVID-19 pandemic

  • Online:2020-10-20 Published:2020-10-20

摘要: 目的 探究疫情期间广东省内普通群众及医护人员的心理健康状况及其影响因素。方法 利用线上问卷的方法进行调查,调查自311日开始,于315日结束。调查问卷内容包括4部分:基本情况部分、疫情相关情况部分、疫情认知情况调查部分、焦虑及抑郁调查部分。调查共收集有效问卷1433份,其中普通人群有效问卷706份,医务人员有效问卷727份。采用克朗巴哈系数及探索性因子分析对量表进行信、效度检验,应用单因素分析(卡方和秩和检验)及多因素分析(有序或无序logistic回归)方法对数据进一步分析。结果 校正人口学因素后的分析结果显示,两类人群的焦虑、抑郁情况与疫情认知情况无统计学差异(P>0.05),但相较于疫情前均更高。对于普通人群受调查者,多因素logistic回归结果显示,关注疫情信息达1~2 h者的焦虑的OR值为1.931.183.17),而3 h以上者焦虑的OR值为1.881.143.11);普通人群中尚未结婚者抑郁的OR值为2.191.513.18);不正确疫情认知与焦虑、抑郁发生正相关;尚未结婚的人、高学历的人的不良疫情认知的发生率更低;对于医务人员受调查者,多因素logistic回归结果显示,休息时间不足、对自身感染病毒的担忧易导致焦虑与抑郁;护士发生明显抑郁的OR值为2.991.456.18);相较于非定点医院医务人员,定点医院医护人员发生明显抑郁、严重抑郁的OR值分别为0.480.250.93)及0.390.170.89);对自身感染病毒的担忧会增加认知错误的可能性。结论 应加强普通人群及医务人员的心理干预,尤其是普通人群中尚未结婚的群体及医务人员中的护士群体,避免人们过长时间接触疫情相关信息,保证医务人员的充分休息,同时应加强在基层及医院的疫情科普宣传。

关键词: 新型冠状病毒肺炎, 普通群众, 医务人员, 心理健康

Abstract: Objective To investigate the mental health status and its influencing factors among general population and healthcare professionals in Guangdong Province during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods A online questionnaire-based survey was conducted from March 11st to March 15th, 2020. The questionnaire consisted of 4 parts to survey the participants' basic information, understanding of COVID-19 outbreak-associated information, cognition of COVID-19 pandemic and status of anxiety and depression. A total of 1433 valid responses were collected, including 706 from the general population and 727 from healthcare professionals. Cronbach's α coefficient and exploratory factor analysis were used for reliability and validity assessment. Chi-square, Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for univariate analysis and ordinal or nominal logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis of the data. Results There was no significant difference between the general population and the healthcare professionals in terms of anxiety, depression and cognition of COVID-19 outbreak after adjustment for demographic variables, but the levels of anxiety and depression of these participants were both higher than those before the pandemic. In the participants from the general population, multivariate logistic regressions showed an OR for anxiety of 1.93 (1.18, 3.17) among those who spent 1-2 h a day in reading COVID-19-related news, while those who spent over 3 h had an OR value for anxiety of 1.88 (1.14, 3.11); the unmarried individuals had a depression OR of 2.19 (1.51, 3.18). Inaccurate cognition of COVID-19 outbreak was positive correlated with the occurrence of anxiety and depression. Unmarried individuals and those with higher educational levels had better cognition of COVID-19 outbreak. Among the healthcare professionals, multivariate logistic regressions suggested that insufficient rest time and worries about contracting the virus contributed to the occurrence of anxiety and depression. Among the nursing staff, the OR of obvious depression was 2.99 (1.45, 6.18). Compared to healthcare professionals not working in designated hospital for COVID-19, those who work in the designated hospitals had ORs for obvious and severe depression of 0.48 (0.25,0.93) and 0.39 (0.17,0.89), respectively. Concerns over contracting the virus increased the possibility of incorrect cognition of COVID-19. Conclusion Psychological interventions are essential for both the general population and healthcare professionals, especially for unmarried individuals in the general population and the nursing staff. An excessive exposure to COVID-19-related information may have detrimental effects on the mental health. For healthcare professionals, sufficient rest needs to be ensured, and education programs on COVID-19 should be implemented among both residents and healthcare professionals to improve their mental health.

Key words: coronavirus disease 2019, general population, healthcare professionals, mental health