Journal of Southern Medical University ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 1682-.
Previous Articles Next Articles
Online:
Published:
Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of different restoration methods on fracture resistance of endodontically treatedteeth. Methods Fifty intact extracted maxillary first premolars were randomly divided into 5 groups. Medial-occlusal cavitymodels were established in all the test groups (B-E) according to the same standard, followed by treatments with defectexposure only, defect filling with light cured composite resin, indirect resin inlays, or light cured composite resin combinedwith Biosplint fiber. Each specimen was tested using a universal test machine at 1.00 mm/min until fracture and the fractureload was recorded. The load angle was 45 degree to the long axis of the teeth, and the load was pointed to the middle of thelingual surface on the buccal cusp. The fracture resistance was analyzed statistically. Results The mean load to cause fractureof the samples in each group group A to E was 1.27 ± 0.41, 0.23 ± 0.17, 0.55 ± 0.31, 0.89 ± 0.40, and 0.98 ± 0.34 kN, respectively,showing significant differences between the groups. Conclusion The fracture resistance of the teeth is reduced afterendodontic therapy, but can be increased significantly by restoration with composite resin inlay or light cured composite resincombined with Biosplint fiber.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.j-smu.com/EN/
https://www.j-smu.com/EN/Y2013/V33/I11/1682