南方医科大学学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 1601-1610.doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2026.07.14
• • 上一篇
收稿日期:2025-12-31
出版日期:2026-07-20
发布日期:2026-07-20
通讯作者:
邱峰
E-mail:541550790@qq.com;QFSFL@126. com
作者简介:操龙斌,硕士,主管技师,E-mail: 541550790@qq.com
基金资助:
Longbin CAO(
), Peixiang HUANG, Zikang ZHANG, Weimin SUN, Feng QIU(
)
Received:2025-12-31
Online:2026-07-20
Published:2026-07-20
Contact:
Feng QIU
E-mail:541550790@qq.com;QFSFL@126. com
摘要:
目的 对健康妇女乳汁中分离得到的菌株BPA03进行鉴定,并评价其安全性与益生特性。 方法 通过稀释平板涂布法和划线分离法在血琼脂培养基和MRS固体培养基上对乳汁中的菌株进行分离纯化和菌落形态观察;采用革兰氏染色鉴别菌株的形态与革兰氏阴阳性;采用BD鉴定卡对菌株BPA03进行生理生化性质的鉴定;结合16S rRNA测序与系统发育分析,对菌株BPA03进行了分子生物学鉴定;采用血琼脂平板检测菌株BPA03的溶血性;采用KB法检测菌株BPA03对抗生素的敏感性;使用生化分析仪检测其发酵液中的乳酸浓度;斑马鱼胚胎急性毒性实验评价其安全性;利用紫外线及D-半乳糖诱导的斑马鱼衰老模型,评价菌株BPA03的益生特性。 结果 菌株BPA03在MRS培养基上生长良好,菌落呈乳白色半透明、圆形、表面光滑、边缘整齐;该菌革兰氏染色为阳性,球形或卵圆形,多呈单、双或短链状排列,直径0.5~1.0 μm。菌株BPA03经形态学、生理生化及16S rRNA系统发育分析,被鉴定为乳酸片球菌。溶血性试验结果显示,该菌在血琼脂平板上无溶血环;药敏试验对青霉素、氨苄西林、万古霉素等测试抗生素均敏感。菌株BPA03成人血培养需氧瓶中35 ℃培养时,延滞期约2 h,对数生长期为4~12 h,20 h后进入稳定期,在MRS培养基中培养约8 h乳酸产量达到饱和终浓度为23.6 mmol/L。斑马鱼胚胎急性毒性实验表明,即使在10⁸ CFU/mL浓度下,胚胎孵化率仍高于95%,LD50>10⁸ CFU/mL,无显著急性毒性。在益生功能方面,BPA03在紫外线诱导的斑马鱼光老化模型中,能有效抑制尾鳍损伤并改善光老化;在D-半乳糖诱导的衰老模型中,BPA03能显著降低机体ROS与丙二醛(MDA)含量,提升超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)及谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSH-Px)的抗氧化酶活性,并下调促炎细胞因子白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、白细胞介素-8(IL-8)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)的mRNA表达水平(与模型组比较,P<0.05)。 结论 从健康妇女乳汁中分离得到的菌株BPA03被鉴定为乳酸片球菌,其具有良好的益生效应和安全性。
操龙斌, 黄佩香, 张子康, 孙卫民, 邱峰. 人乳源乳酸片球菌BPA03的分离鉴定及其抗氧化与抗衰老益生特性评价[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2026, 46(7): 1601-1610.
Longbin CAO, Peixiang HUANG, Zikang ZHANG, Weimin SUN, Feng QIU. Isolation and identification of Pediococcus acidilactici BPA03 derived from human milk and evaluation of its antioxidant and anti-aging probiotic properties[J]. Journal of Southern Medical University, 2026, 46(7): 1601-1610.
| Gene | Forward (5'—3') | Reverse (5'—3') |
|---|---|---|
| IL-1β | GTCACACTGAGAGCCGGAAG | GCAGGCCAGGTACAGGTTAC |
| IL-6 | TGAAGGGGTCAGGATCAGCA | CACGTCAGGACGCTGTAGATT |
| IL-8 | GTCGCTGCATTGAAACAGAA | CTTAACCCATGGAGCAGAGG |
| TNF-α | GGCTGGAAAACAACGAGATCA | AAGATCAAAGACGGCTCCAA |
| β-actin | AGGGAAATCGTGCGTGACATCA | ACTCATCGTACTCCTGCTTGCTGA |
表1 qRT-PCR引物序列
Tab.1 Sequences of the primers for qRT-PCR
| Gene | Forward (5'—3') | Reverse (5'—3') |
|---|---|---|
| IL-1β | GTCACACTGAGAGCCGGAAG | GCAGGCCAGGTACAGGTTAC |
| IL-6 | TGAAGGGGTCAGGATCAGCA | CACGTCAGGACGCTGTAGATT |
| IL-8 | GTCGCTGCATTGAAACAGAA | CTTAACCCATGGAGCAGAGG |
| TNF-α | GGCTGGAAAACAACGAGATCA | AAGATCAAAGACGGCTCCAA |
| β-actin | AGGGAAATCGTGCGTGACATCA | ACTCATCGTACTCCTGCTTGCTGA |
图1 人乳来源乳酸片球菌BPA03菌落形态特征
Fig.1 Colonial morphology of human milk-derived P. acidilactici BPA03. A, B: Colony morphology of BPA03 strain. C: Micrograph of Gram-stained BPA03 (Original magnification: ×200). D: Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) of BPA03 strain.
| Biochemical test | BPA03 | Biochemical Test | BPA03 | Biochemical Test | BPA03 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A_ARARR | - | A_GLPRB | + | A_LALT | + |
| A_LARGH | + | A_LHIST | - | A_LISO | + |
| A_LLEUH | + | A_LPHET | + | A_LPROB | - |
| A_LPYR | - | A_LTRY | + | A_META | + |
| C_3MGA | - | C_CLST | - | C_DFRU | + |
| C_DGUA | - | C_DMNT | - | C_IMN | - |
| C_KGA | - | C_MAA | - | C_PXB | - |
| C_THY | - | M_ADGLU | - | M_BDCEL | + |
| M_BDGAL | - | M_BDGLC | - | M_BDGLU | + |
| M_NAG | + | M_PHOS | - | M_PHOT | - |
| N_ALALH | - | N_LPROT | - | N_VAALA | - |
| P_ADGLU | - | P_PHOL | - | R_BGEN | - |
| R_DEX | + | R_DSUC | - | R_DTAG | - |
| R_DTRE | - | R_MAL | - | R_MTT | - |
| R_NGU | + | S_URE | - | T_ESC | - |
| R_MGP | - |
表2 乳酸片球菌BPA03生化反应结果
Tab.2 Biochemical reaction results of isolated P. acidilactici BPA03 strain
| Biochemical test | BPA03 | Biochemical Test | BPA03 | Biochemical Test | BPA03 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A_ARARR | - | A_GLPRB | + | A_LALT | + |
| A_LARGH | + | A_LHIST | - | A_LISO | + |
| A_LLEUH | + | A_LPHET | + | A_LPROB | - |
| A_LPYR | - | A_LTRY | + | A_META | + |
| C_3MGA | - | C_CLST | - | C_DFRU | + |
| C_DGUA | - | C_DMNT | - | C_IMN | - |
| C_KGA | - | C_MAA | - | C_PXB | - |
| C_THY | - | M_ADGLU | - | M_BDCEL | + |
| M_BDGAL | - | M_BDGLC | - | M_BDGLU | + |
| M_NAG | + | M_PHOS | - | M_PHOT | - |
| N_ALALH | - | N_LPROT | - | N_VAALA | - |
| P_ADGLU | - | P_PHOL | - | R_BGEN | - |
| R_DEX | + | R_DSUC | - | R_DTAG | - |
| R_DTRE | - | R_MAL | - | R_MTT | - |
| R_NGU | + | S_URE | - | T_ESC | - |
| R_MGP | - |
图3 人乳来源乳酸片球菌BPA03溶血反应检测结果
Fig.3 Test results of hemolytic activity of P. acidilactici BPA03. 1: Negative control bacterium: non-pathogenic Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922). 2: Positive control bacterium: Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213). 3: P. acidilactici BPA03.
| Antibiotics | Drug mass (μg) | Disk diffusion test results (mm) | Drug sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penicillin | 10 | 28.10±0.53 | Sensitive |
| Ampicillin | 10 | 25.17±0.93 | Sensitive |
| Imipenem | 10 | 26.63±0.42 | Sensitive |
| Vancomycin | 30 | 30.73±0.38 | Sensitive |
| Erythromycin | 15 | 24.63±0.84 | Sensitive |
| Clindamycin | 2 | 30.00±0.85 | Sensitive |
| Linezolid | 30 | 22.33±0.74 | Sensitive |
表3 人乳来源乳酸片球菌BPA03药敏性
Tab.3 Drug sensitivity tests of P. acidilactici BPA03 (Mean±SD)
| Antibiotics | Drug mass (μg) | Disk diffusion test results (mm) | Drug sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penicillin | 10 | 28.10±0.53 | Sensitive |
| Ampicillin | 10 | 25.17±0.93 | Sensitive |
| Imipenem | 10 | 26.63±0.42 | Sensitive |
| Vancomycin | 30 | 30.73±0.38 | Sensitive |
| Erythromycin | 15 | 24.63±0.84 | Sensitive |
| Clindamycin | 2 | 30.00±0.85 | Sensitive |
| Linezolid | 30 | 22.33±0.74 | Sensitive |
图4 乳酸片球菌 BPA03生长及产酸曲线
Fig.4 Growth curve and lactic acid production of P. acidilactici BPA03. A: Growth curve of BPA03 [R: relative growth (A600 nm)]. B: Lactic acid production by P. acidilactici BPA03 in fermentation test.
图5 乳酸片球菌 BPA03对斑马鱼毒性试验
Fig.5 Toxicity test of P. acidilactici BPA03 in zebrafish embryos.A: Morphological changes of zebrafish embryos exposed todifferent concentrations of BPA03 (Scale bar=1000 μm). B:Effects of BPA03 exposure on hatchability of zebrafish embryos (n=5). No significant changes were observed in hatchability at96 h (one-way ANOVA).
图6 乳酸片球菌BPA03对紫外线诱导斑马鱼衰老的影响
Fig.6 Effect of P. acidilactici BPA03 on ultraviolet-induced aging in zebrafish. A: Morphological changes of the zebrafish with UV exposure with and without P. acidilactici BPA03 treatment. B: Effect of P. acidilactici BPA03 on caudal fin damage in zebrafish larvae exposed to UV. C: Comparison of caudal fin area (pixels) among the 4 groups. ***P<0.001.
图7 乳酸片球菌BPA03对D-半乳糖诱导斑马鱼幼虫衰老的影响
Fig.7 Effect of P. acidilactici BPA03 on D-galactose-induced aging in zebrafish larvae. A: Intracellular ROS production in zebrafish larvae detected by DCFH‑DA staining. B: Quantitative analysis of ROS levels (n=10). C: Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in zebrafish larvae. D: Catalase (CAT) activity in zebrafish larvae. E: Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity in zebrafish larvae. F: Malondialdehyde (MDA) content in zebrafish larvae. Data are expressed as Mean±SD of 5 samples, with each sample containing 10 zebrafish. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
图8 乳酸片球菌BPA03对D-半乳糖诱导斑马鱼幼虫衰老体内炎症因子表达的影响
Fig.8 Effects of P. acidilactici BPA03 on inflammatory factors in a zebrafish larvae model of D‑galactose‑ induced aging. A: Expression level of IL‑1β mRNA in zebrafish larvae. B: Expression level of IL‑6 mRNA in zebrafish larvae. C: Expression level of IL‑8 mRNA in zebrafish larvae. D: Expression level of TNF‑α mRNA in zebrafish larvae. Data are presented as Mean±SD of 5 samples, each containing 10 zebrafish larvae. Statistical analysis was performed using one‑way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test for group‑wise validation; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
| [1] | Zhang M, Qiao H, Yang SW, et al. Human breast milk: the role of its microbiota and metabolites in infant health[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2024, 72(19): 10665-78. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.3c07690 |
| [2] | Dombrowska-Pali A, Wiktorczyk-Kapischke N, Chrustek A, et al. Human milk microbiome-a review of scientific reports[J]. Nutrients, 2024, 16(10): 1420. doi:10.3390/nu16101420 |
| [3] | Qiao YT, Qiu ZC, Tian FW, et al. Pediococcus acidilactici strains improve constipation symptoms and regulate intestinal flora in mice[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2021, 11: 655258. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.655258 |
| [4] | Hu R, Zhang Y, Qian WY, et al. Pediococcus acidilactici promotes the longevity of C. elegans by regulating the insulin/IGF-1 and JNK/MAPK signaling, fat accumulation and chloride ion[J]. Front Nutr, 2022, 9: 821685. doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.821685 |
| [5] | Lin WH, Jiang WP, Chen CC, et al. Renoprotective effect of Pediococcus acidilactici GKA4 on cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury by mitigating inflammation and oxidative stress and regulating the MAPK, AMPK/SIRT1/NF-κB, and PI3K/AKT pathways[J]. Nutrients, 2022, 14(14): 2877. doi:10.3390/nu14142877 |
| [6] | Fu WH, Chen C, Xie Q, et al. Pediococcus acidilactici strain alleviates gluten-induced food allergy and regulates gut microbiota in mice[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2022, 12: 845142. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2022.845142 |
| [7] | Zhang Q, Guo WL, Chen GM, et al. Pediococcus acidilactici FZU106 alleviates high-fat diet-induced lipid metabolism disorder in association with the modulation of intestinal microbiota in hyperlipidemic rats[J]. Curr Res Food Sci, 2022, 5: 775-88. doi:10.1016/j.crfs.2022.04.009 |
| [8] | Wang YJ, Xue Y, Xu H, et al. Pediococcus acidilactici Y01 reduces HFD-induced obesity via altering gut microbiota and metabolomic profiles and modulating adipose tissue macrophage M1/M2 polarization[J]. Food Funct, 2025, 16(2): 554-69. doi:10.1039/d4fo04301d |
| [9] | Ji J, An ZY, Khan A, et al. Pediococcus acidilactici GR-5 alleviates hyperuricemia by degrading purine nucleosides and improving gut microbiota metabolism[J]. NPJ Sci Food, 2025, 9(1): 183. doi:10.1038/s41538-025-00556-y |
| [10] | Ren L, Wang SS, Liu ST, et al. Postbiotic of Pediococcus acidilactici GQ01, a novel probiotic strain isolated from natural fermented wolfberry, attenuates hyperuricaemia in mice through modulating uric acid metabolism and gut microbiota[J]. Foods, 2024, 13(6): 923. doi:10.3390/foods13060923 |
| [11] | Niu TM, Jiang YX, Fan SH, et al. Antiviral effects of Pediococcus acidilactici isolated from Tibetan mushroom and comparative genomic analysis[J]. Front Microbiol, 2023, 13: 1069981. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.1069981 |
| [12] | Wang YH, Gong J, Geng KX, et al. Pediococcus acidilactici attenuates chronic stress-induced depression via generating metabolite indole-3-lactic acid and downregulating neuroinflam-mation[J]. J Neuroinflammation, 2025, 22(1): 267. doi:10.1186/s12974-025-03580-7 |
| [13] | OECD. Test Guideline No. 236: Fish Embryo Acute Toxicity (FET) Test [S]. Paris: OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, Section 2, 2013. |
| [14] | Yao F, Du YW, Wang YX, et al. Acute toxicity of deoxynivalenol and bioremediation of a highly effective deoxynivalenol degrading Achromobacter spanius P-9 on zebrafish embryos and adults[J]. Chemosphere, 2024, 364: 143111. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143111 |
| [15] | Zhang J, Xu YH, Ruan XY, et al. Photoprotective effects of epigallocatechin gallate on ultraviolet-induced zebrafish and human skin fibroblasts cells[J]. Mediators Inflamm, 2024, 2024: 7887678. doi:10.1155/2024/7887678 |
| [16] | Zhang ZK, Zheng KD, Zhang Z, et al. Lactobacillus gasseri LGV03-derived indole-3-lactic acid ameliorates immune response by activating aryl hydrocarbon receptor[J]. Microb Cell Fact, 2025, 24(1): 34. doi:10.1186/s12934-025-02662-8 |
| [17] | Tian C, Deng SZ, Zhang Z, et al. Bifidobacterium bifidum 1007478 derived indole-3-lactic acid alleviates NASH via an aromatic hydrocarbon receptor-dependent pathway in zebrafish[J]. Life Sci, 2025, 369: 123557. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2025.123557 |
| [18] | Senjaliya DP, Georrge JJ. Comparative study on biochemical and molecular identification approaches of Lactobacillus species[J]. Int Food Res J, 2023, 30(5): 1105-24. doi:10.47836/ifrj.30.5.03 |
| [19] | FAO/WHO. Joint FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization) Working Group Report on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food[R]. London Ontario, Canada, 2002. |
| [20] | Di Vincenzo F, Del Gaudio A, Petito V, et al. Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: a narrative review[J]. Intern Emerg Med, 2024, 19(2): 275-93. doi:10.1007/s11739-023-03374-w |
| [21] | Muteeb G, Rehman MT, Shahwan M, et al. Origin of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance, and their impacts on drug development: a narrative review[J]. Pharmaceuticals, 2023, 16(11): 1615. doi:10.3390/ph16111615 |
| [22] | Tian PJ, Yang HY, Hang F, et al. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Pediococcus acidilactici CCFM6432 in alleviating depression[J]. Microbiome Res Rep, 2024, 3(4): 49. doi:10.20517/mrr.2024.33 |
| [23] | Zhang Y, Qian WY, Zhang YT, et al. Pediococcus acidilactici reduces tau pathology and ameliorates behavioral deficits in models of neurodegenerative disorders[J]. Cell Commun Signal, 2024, 22(1): 84. doi:10.1186/s12964-023-01419-3 |
| [24] | Li JT, Ma P, Liu ZZ, et al. L- and D-Lactate: unveiling their hidden functions in disease and health[J]. Cell Commun Signal, 2025, 23(1): 134. doi:10.1186/s12964-025-02132-z |
| [25] | Zhang ZS, Tan R, Xiong ZY, et al. Dysregulation of autophagy during photoaging reduce oxidative stress and inflammatory damage caused by UV[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2025, 16: 1562845. doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1562845 |
| [26] | García-Giménez JL, Cánovas-Cervera I, Nacher-Sendra E, et al. Oxidative stress and central metabolism pathways impact epigenetic modulation in inflammation and immune response[J]. Free Radic Biol Med, 2025, 233: 378-99. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2025.04.004 |
| [27] | Chirumbolo S, Bertossi D, Magistretti P. Insights on the role of L-lactate as a signaling molecule in skin aging[J]. Biogerontology, 2023, 24(5): 709-26. doi:10.1007/s10522-023-10018-1 |
| [28] | Khmaladze I, Butler É, Fabre S, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938-a comparative study on the effect of probiotics and lysates on human skin[J]. Exp Dermatol, 2019, 28(7): 822-8. doi:10.1111/exd.13950 |
| [29] | Liu YP, Liu XQ, Wang Y, et al. Protective effect of Lactobacillus plantarum on alcoholic liver injury and regulating of keap-Nrf2-ARE signaling pathway in zebrafish larvae[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(9): e0222339. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222339 |
| [30] | Gao Y, Liang QM, Sun JQ, et al. Probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria with antioxidant properties in modulating health: Mechanisms, applications, and future directions[J]. Food Biosci, 2025, 66: 106181. doi:10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106181 |
| [1] | 傅玉芳, 谭伟玲, 李小翠, 林荣钿, 刘叔文, 叶玲. 罗浮山风湿膏药通过抑制TLR4/TNF-α信号通路缓解小鼠神经病理性疼痛[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2025, 45(11): 2285-2296. |
| [2] | 苏炳森, 操龙斌, 郑介婷, 张 琳, 张子康, 邱 峰. 健康妇女生殖道内格氏乳杆菌的分离鉴定与安全性评价[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2021, 41(12): 1809-1815. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||